مفهوم‌پردازی رفتارشارلاتی در سازمان: اثر رهبری اصیل درک شده و هویت اخلاقی کارکنان در بخش دولتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصادی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

2 استاد، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصادی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

3 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصادی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

چکیده
این مطالعه با هدف شناسایی مؤلفه‌های رفتار شارلاتانی و بررسی تأثیر رهبری اصیل با نقش تعدیل‌گری هویت اخلاقی بر آن در قلمرو سازمان‌های دولتی استان خراسان جنوبی صورت گرفت. فلسفه تحقیق پراگماتیسم و رویکرد آن آمیخته اکتشافی است. استراتژی بخش کیفی پدیدارشناسی است که بر اساس تجربه زیسته 16 نفر از شاغلین بخش دولتی که به روش هدفمند انتخاب شده بودند، از طریق مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته صورت گرفت. داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار مکس‌کیودا و روش کلایزی تحلیل گردید. بر اساس نتایج بخش کیفی، مدل اولیه رفتار شارلاتانی در سازمان در قالب چهار مؤلفه، پانزده زیرمؤلفه و در مجموع سی و چهار درون‌مایه اصلی استخراج گردید. سپس در بخش کمی یک پرسشنامه محقق‌ساخته که‌ بر اساس مدل اولیه استخراج و روایی و پایایی آن تأیید شده بود، در بین 612 نفر از کارکنان این بخش که به روش نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌ای انتخاب شدند، توزیع گردید. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌های کمی و انجام تحلیل عامل تأییدی به روش معادلات ساختاری و با استفاده از نرم‌افزار ایموس صورت گرفت. بر اساس نتایج تحلیل عامل تأییدی همه 34 درون‌مایه اصلی رفتار شارلاتانی مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. شاخص برازش تطبیقی برای مدل تحقیق 0/983 برآورد شد که نشان از برازش مطلوب مدل دارد. نتایج بخش کمی نشان داد که رهبری اصیل بر رفتار شارلاتانی تأثیر منفی و معناداری دارد. هویت اخلاقی کارکنان نیز تأثیر رهبری اصیل بر رفتار شارلاتانی را تعدیل می‌نماید. این تحقیق با توجه به زمینه محور بودن آن سبب شد زوایا و مفاهیم جدیدی برای رفتار شارلاتانی در بخش دولتی شناسایی گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

Conceptualizing Charlatan Behavior in Organizations: The Effect of Perceived Authentic Leadership and Employees' Moral Identity in the Public Sector

نویسندگان English

Moharram Abrary Roomenjan 1
Fariborz Rahimnia 2
Gholamreza Malekzadeh 3
Azar Kaffashpoor 2
1 Ph.D. Candidate of Public Administration, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
2 Prof, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
3 Associate Prof, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
چکیده English

This study was conducted with the aim of identifying the components of charlatan behavior and investigating the effect of authentic leadership with the moderating role of moral identity on it in government organizations of South Khorasan province. The research philosophy is pragmatism and its approach is exploratory mixed method. The strategy of the qualitative part is phenomenology, which is based on the lived experience of 16 government employees who were selected purposefully. The data were analyzed using MAXQDA software and Colaizzi's method. Based on the results of this section, the primary model of charlatan behavior in the organization was extracted in the form of four components, fifteen sub-components and a total of thirty-four main themes. In the quantitative part, a questionnaire was prepared based on the initial model. After confirming its validity and reliability, it was distributed to 612 government employees who were selected through stratified sampling. Structural equation method and Amos software were used to analyze the data of this section and perform confirmatory factor analysis. Based on the results, all 34 main themes of charlatan behavior were confirmed. The comparative fit index for the research model was estimated 0.983, which showed the good fit of the model. The results showed that authentic leadership has a negative and significant effect on charlatan behavior. Employees' moral identity also moderates the effect of authentic leadership on charlatan behavior. Considering its context-oriented nature, this research led to identifying new angles for charlatan behavior in the public sector.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Charlatan Behavior
Authentic Leadership
Moral Identity
Unethical Behaviors
[1] Rauh, J. (2020). Unethical Behavior’s Moderating Effect on Managerial and Organizational Outcomes: Evidence from Public Hospitals. Public Integrity, 22(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2018.1479933
[2] Doaei, H. A.; Eslami, G.; & Gholami, M. (2021). Investigating the Impact of Organizational Rumor and Gossip on Employees’ Job attitudes and Performance through Organizational Cynicism in the Public Sector. Transformation Management Journal, 13(spring & summer 2021), 55-84. https://doi.org/10.22067/pmt.v12i1.86295 (In Persian(
[3] Arabi, M.; Seidnaghavi, M. A.; Vaezi, R.; & Koshki Jahromi, A. (2023). Identifying the value creation components of human resources in selected government organizations in the field of culture. Management Research in Iran, 27(3), 30-55. (In Persian(
[4] KrambiaKapardis, M. (2016). Financial Crisis, Fraud, and Corruption. In Corporate Fraud and Corruption (pp. 5-38). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137406439_2
[5] Basri, S. A.; Marsam, A. D.; Majid, R. A.; Abu, N. A.; & Mohamed, N. (2017). Reinforcement Tool of Whistleblowing to Eradicate Fraud in Public Sector. (M. Y. Jaaffar, A. Abdullah Sani, & A. Muhammad, eds.), SHS Web of Conferences, 36, 38.     https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173600038
[6] Parnell, J. A.; & Singer, M. G. (2001). The organizational charlatan scale developing an instrument to measure false performance. Journal of Management Development, 20(5), 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710110395426
[7] Ergun, H. (2021). The Effect of Mushroom Manager Behavior on Organizational Charlatan and Organizational Loneliness. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 8(2), 359-378. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v8i2.481
[8] Abraham, J.; & Berline, R. P. N. (2015). An Investigation on Organizational Charlatan Behaviour and Moral Identity as Predictors of Shame: Importance for Education. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 9(2), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v9i2.1535
[9] Rahimian, M.; & Mirmohammadi, S. M. (2014). The effect of authentic leadership on employees creativity with regard to the mediator role of psychological capital. Management Research in Iran, 18(3), 181-204. Dor: 20.1001.1.2322200.1393.18.3.9.4
[10] Gardner, W. L.; Cogliser, C. C.; Davis, K. M.; & Dickens, M. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1120-1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.007
[11] Gigol, T. (2020). Influence of Authentic Leadership on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: The Intermediate Role of Work Engagement. Sustainability, 12(3), 1182-1195.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031182
[12] Reed, A.; & Aquino, K. F. (2003). Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1270-1286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1270
[13] Khan, M. K.; & Nazeer, S. (2021). Mediating Role of Moral Identity in the Relationship between Ethical Leadership and Unethical Behavior of Employees: Evidence from the Oil and Gas Sector of Pakistan. Journal of Management and Research, 8(2), 98-130. https://doi.org/10.29145/jmr/82/04
[14] Taha Ibrahim Mohamed, A. N.; & Samman, A.M.A. (2022). Moral Identity as Moderator in the Relationship between Machiavellian Leadership perception and Employees Opportunistic Behaviors. Information Sciences Letters, 11(1), 241-.256 https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/110125
[15] De Francesco, G.; & Beard, M. (1939). The Power of the Charlatan. Yale University Press.
[16] Gbadamosi, G.; Ndaba, J.; & Oni, F. (2007). Predicting charlatan behaviour in a non‐Western setting: lack of trust or absence of commitment? Journal of Management De-velopment, 26(8), 753-769. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710710777264
[17] Vermeir, K. (2020). Charlatan epistemology: As illustrated by a study of wonder-working in the late seventeenth-century Dutch Republic. Science in Context, 33(4), 363-384. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889721000193
[18] Avolio, B. J.; & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
[19] Luthans, F.; & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership development. Positive Organizational Scholarship, 241, 258
[20] Walumbwa, F. O.; Avolio, B. J.; Gardner, W. L.; Wernsing, T. S.; & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure†. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913
[21] Liu, Y.; Fuller, B.; Hester, K.; Bennett, R. J.; & Dickerson, M. S. (2018). Linking authentic leadership to subordinate behaviors. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(2), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-12-2016-0327
[22] Cianci, A. M.; Hannah, S. T.; Roberts, R. P.; & Tsakumis, G. T. (2014). The effects of authentic leadership on followers’ ethical decision-making in the face of temptation: An experimental study. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 581-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.12.001
[23] Abdelwahid, A. E. A. (2020). Workplace Trust and Authentic Leadership as Predictors of Work-related Bullying among Staff Nurses. International Journal of Nursing Education, 12(1), 90-95. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijone.v12i1.3700
[24] Cheng, J.; Usman, M.; Bai, H.; & He, Y. (2022). Can authentic leaders reduce the spread of negative workplace gossip? The roles of subordinates’ perceived procedural justice and interactional justice. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(1), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.32
[25] Hardy, S. A.; & Carlo, G. (2011). Moral Identity. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), (S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles, Eds.), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research (pp. 495-513). New York, NY: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_19
[26] Aquino, K.; & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423-1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423
[27] Teng, Z.; Nie, Q.; Zhu, Z.; & Guo, C. (2020). Violent video game exposure and (Cyber) bullying perpetration among Chinese youth: The moderating role of trait aggression and moral identity. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106193
[28] Schipper, N.; Goagoses, N.; & Koglin, U. (2023). Associations between moral identity, social goal orientations, and moral decisions in adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(1), 107-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2022.2056160
[29] Hardy, S. A.; Bean, D. S.; & Olsen, J. A. (2015). Moral Identity and Adolescent Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors: Interactions with Moral Disengagement and Self-regulation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(8), 1542-1554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0172-1
[30] Mulder, L. B.; & Aquino, K. (2013). The role of moral identity in the aftermath of dishonesty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(2), 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.03.005
[31] Reynolds, S. J.; & Ceranic, T. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1610-1624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1610
[32] Gan, C. (2018). Ethical Leadership and Unethical Employee Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(8), 1271-1283. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7328