نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری سیاست‌گذاری بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 استاد، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

بسیاری از شراکت‌های راهبردی فرامرزی به علت انتخاب‌ها و تصمیم‌های ضعیف در زمینه حاکمیت شرکتی با شکست مواجه می‌شوند. از آنجایی‌که امروزه شکل‌گیری شراکت‌های راهبردی فرامرزی یکی از استراتژی‌های کارآمد برای رقابت‌پذیری بنگاه‌ها و محصولات ایرانی در بازارهای بین‌المللی است، تشریح زیربناها و الزامات طراحی نظام حاکمیتی نقش بسیار مهمی در ارتقای توان عملیاتی شراکت‌های راهبردی شرکت‌های ایرانی با شرکای خارجی دارد. به همین‌منظور پژوهش حاضر با رویکرد اکتشافی و بهره‌گیری از نظریه داده‌بنیاد درصدد ارائه مدلی برای حاکمیت شرکتی در شراکت‌های راهبردی فرامرزی است. داده‌های موردنیاز از خلال نمونه‌گیری نظری و هدف‌مند از 11 شراکت راهبردی میان شرکای ایرانی و غیرایرانی گردآوری شده است. مدل نهایی پژوهش دربرگیرنده برهم‌کنش اقتضائات بین‌المللی، شرایط شکل‌گیری شراکت راهبردی، سازماندهی شراکت و انتظارات ذی‌نفعان است که بر نظام حاکمیت شرکتی تاثیر می‌گذارند و تصمیم‌گیری بهینه در این زمینه، پایداری شراکت‌های راهبردی را بهبود می‌دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Model for Governance in International Strategic Alliances

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Hossein Jalali 1
  • Hossein Rahmanseresht 2

1 PhD in Business Policy, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Most of international strategic alliances are failed due to weak choices and decisions about corporate governance. Todays, as alliance formation is an effective strategy for the competitiveness of Iranian firms and products in international markets; the explanation of foundations and requirements of governance system has a very important role on improvement of operational potency of Iranian alliances with foreign partners. Current research using grounded theory with explorative approach is aimed to present a model for corporate governance in international strategic alliances. The required data were collected from 11 strategic alliances between Iranian and non-Iranian partners. The research model includes interactions between international requirements, conditions of strategic alliance formation, partnership design and expectations of stakeholders which affect corporate governance of international strategic alliances, and optimum decisions in this matters, improved durability and endurance of strategic alliances.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • International Strategic Alliances
  • Corporate Governance
  • Organization Design
[1]          Lavie, D., Haunschild, P. R., & Khanna, P. (2012). Organizational differences, relational mechanisms, and alliance performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(13), 1453-1479.
[2]          Jabbarzadeh Karbasi, B., Rahmanseresht, H., Khashei, V., & Khalil Nezhad, S. (2019). Factors Affecting Inter-organizational cooperation at the front-end phase. Management Research in Iran, 23(2), 55-77.
[3]          He, Q., Meadows, M., Angwin, D., Gomes, E., & Child, J. (2020). Strategic alliance research in the era of digital transformation: Perspectives on future research. British Journal of Management, 31(3), 589-617.
[4]          Contractor, F. J., & Reuer, J. J. (2014). Structuring and governing alliances: New directions for research. Global Strategy Journal, 4(4), 241-256.
[5]          Lin, H., & Darnall, N. (2015). Strategic alliance formation and structural configuration. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 549-564.
[6]          Gomes-Casseres, B. (2015). Remix Strategy: The Three Laws of Business Combinations. MA: Harvard Business Review.
[7]          Gomes, E., Barnes, B. R., & Mahmood, T. (2016). A 22-year review of strategic alliance research in the leading management journals. International Business Review, 25(1), 15-27.
[8]          Bakker, R. M. (2016). Stepping in and stepping out: Strategic alliance partner reconfiguration and the unplanned termination of complex projects. Strategic Management Journal, 37(9), 1919-1941.
[9]          Albers, S., Wohlgezogen, F., & Zajac, E. J. (2016). Strategic alliance structures: An organization design perspective. Journal of Management, 42(3), 582-614.
[10]       Sepahvand, R., Aref nejad, M., & Shariat Nejad, A. (2017). Identification and prioritization of factors causing organizational inertia using delphi fuzzy method. Modern Research in Decision Making, 2(1), 95-118.
[11]       Rezaee, Z., Azar, A., Moghbel, A., a&Dehghan Nayeri, M. (2018). Diagnosing Organizational Structure Based on the Viable System Model (VSM). Modern Research in Decision Making, 3(1), 187-215.
[12]       Krishnan, R., Geyskens, I., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (2016). The effectiveness of contractual and trust‐based governance in strategic alliances under behavioral and environmental uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal, 37(12), 2521-2542.
[13]       Chung, C. C., & Beamish, P. W. (2012). Multi-party international joint ventures: Multiple post-formation change processes. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 648-663.
[14]       Subramanian, G. (2015). Corporate governance 2.0. Harvard Business Review, 93(3), 96-105.
[15]       Bell, R. G., Filatotchev, I., & Aguilera, R. V. (2014). Corporate governance and investors' perceptions of foreign IPO value: An institutional perspective. Academy of Management journal, 57(1), 301-320.
[16]       Klijn, E., Reuer, J. J., Volberda, H. W., & Van Den Bosch, F. A. (2019). Ex-post governance in joint ventures: Determinants of monitoring by JV boards of directors. Long Range Planning, 52(1), 72-85.
[17]       Etemad, H. (2004). Internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: a grounded theoretical framework and an overview. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 21(1), 1-21.
[18]       Hasangholipour, T., Heidari, A., & Jalali, S.H. (2018). Investigating partner nationality origin on strategic alliances performance. Management Research in Iran, 22(2), 31-50.
[19]       Hsieh, L. H., Rodrigues, S. B., & Child, J. (2010). Risk perception and post-formation governance in international joint ventures in Taiwan: The perspective of the foreign partner. Journal of International Management, 16(3), 288-303.
[20]       Arranz, N., & De Arroyabe, J. F. (2012). Effect of formal contracts, relational norms and trust on performance of joint research and development projects. British Journal of Management, 23(4), 575-588.
[21]       Lopez-Perez, M. V., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2013). Ownership and trust in the governance structures of Spanish-Moroccan SMEs constituted as international joint ventures. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 21(3), 609-624.
[22]       Reuer, J. J., Klijn, E., & Lioukas, C. S. (2014). Board involvement in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 35(11), 1626-1644.
[23]       Hsieh, L. H., & Rodrigues, S. B. (2014). Revisiting the trustworthiness–performance–governance nexus in international joint ventures. Management International Review, 54(5), 675-705.
[24]       Mohr, A., Wang, C., & Goerzen, A. (2016). The impact of partner diversity within multiparty international joint ventures. International Business Review, 25(4), 883-894.
[25]       Cuypers, I. R., Ertug, G., Reuer, J. J., & Bensaou, B. (2017). Board representation in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 38(4), 920-938.
[26]       Abdi, M., & Aulakh, P. S. (2017). Locus of uncertainty and the relationship between contractual and relational governance in cross-border interfirm relationships. Journal of Management, 43(3), 771-803.
[27]       Wang, L., Jin, J. L., Yang, D., & Zhou, K. Z. (2020). Inter-partner control, trust, and radical innovation of IJVs in China: A contingent governance perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 70-83.
[28]       Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
[29]       Jalali, S.H., Hasangholipour, T., Heidari, A., & Aarabi, S.M. (2019). Meta-Analysis of Effective Factors on Selection of Macro Structural Framework in Strategic Alliances, Journal of Executive Management, 10(19), 89-119.
[30]       Piaskowska, D., Nadolska, A., & Barkema, H. G. (2019). Embracing complexity: Learning from minority, 50-50, and majority joint venture experience. Long Range Planning, 52(1), 134-153.