نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
3 دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
هدف این مقاله تعیین و رتبه بندی ابعاد و شاخص های مؤثر بر توسعه استراتژیک منابع انسانی و ارائه الگویی به منظور اجرای اثربخش توسعه استراتژیک منابع انسانی در سازمان های تحقیقاتی دولتی است. این تحقیق از نظر هدف، توسعه‌ای و از نظر روش، ترکیبی از روش‌های کیفی و کمی است. در این مقاله ابتدا با روش تحلیل محتوا، اطلاعات از منابع الکترونیکی در حوزه توسعه استراتژیک منابع انسانی جمع‌آوری شد، سپس با بهره‌گیری از تکنیک دلفی و نظر نخبگان ابعاد و شاخص‌های توسعه استراتژیک منابع انسانی احصا گشت، در گام بعد ابعاد و شاخص‌های به دست آمده در قالب یک مدل با استفاده از تحلیل عاملی تائیدی مرتبه دوم در نرم‌افزار Lisrel تجزیه و تحلیل شده و سازه الگو طبق تحلیل های به عمل آمده به تائید رسید. نتایج پژوهش نیز نشان می‌دهد که شاخص‌های توسعه استراتژیک منابع انسانی به 4 بعد تقسیم می‌شوند که عبارت‌اند از ابعاد ساختاری، سیاست‌گذاری، فرهنگی و محیطی که از میان این ابعاد، بعد سیاست‌گذاری مهمترین بعد موثر بر توسعه استراتژیک منابع انسانی در سازمان های تحقیقاتی دولتی تشخیص داده شد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Model of Strategic Human Resource Development (Case Study: Governmental Research Organizations)
نویسندگان [English]
- Mirali Seyednaghavi 1
- Vajhollah Ghorbanizadeh 2
- Davoud Hoseinpour 2
- Amin Nedaei 3
چکیده [English]
The purpose of this article is to determine and rank the dimensions and indicators affecting the strategic human resources development and provide a model for the effective implementation of the strategic development of human resources in the government research organizations. In terms of purpose and method, this study is developmental and a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, respectively. We first collected information from the electronic resources of strategic human resource development by a content analysis method and then, using Delphi technique and the opinion of elites, calculated the dimensions and indicators of strategic human. In the next step, the dimensions and indicators obtained in the form of a model were analyzed using a second-order confirmatory factor analysis in the Lisrel software and the structure of the model was confirmed according to the analyzes. The results also show that the factors affecting the strategic development of human resources are divided into four general categories: structural, policy-making, cultural, and environmental factors, among which the policy-making one has the greatest impact on the strategic development of human resources.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Strategic Human Resources Development
- Delphi Technique
- Confirmatory factor analysis
- Government Research Organizations
- Dimensions
- Indicators
- [1] Mitsakis, F. (2019). Modify the Redefined: Strategic Human Resource Development Maturity at a Crossroads. Human Resource Development Review, 18(4), 470-506. [2] Herd, A. M., Shuck, B. M., & Githens, R. P. (2018). Strategic Human Resource Development Alignment from the Employee's Perspective: Initial Development and Proposition Testing of a Measure. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 31(3), 269-291. [3] Peyman A., & Pezeshkan, A. (2011). Developing a Human Resource Strategy Framework: A Knowledge Oriented Approach. Journal of Management Researches in Iran, 15(1), 1-29. (in Persian) [4] Wilhelm, H., Schlömer, M., & Maurer, I. (2015). How dynamic capabilities affect the effectiveness and efficiency of operating routines under high and low levels of environmental dynamism. British Journal of Management, 26(2), 327-345. [5] Alvani, S. M. & Nedaei, A. (1398). Public sector networks: from theory to practice. Tehran. Mahkameh. (in Persian) [6] Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public administration review, 66(2), 168-176. [7] Rashman, L., Withers, E., & Hartley, J. (2009). Organizational learning and knowledge in public service organizations: A systematic review of the literature. International journal of management reviews, 11(4), 463-494. [8] Karimian, Z., Sabbaghian, Z., & Saleh Siddiqui, Bahram (1390). Investigating the barriers and challenges of research and production of science in medical universities. Iranian Higher Education, 3(4), 63-35. (in Persian) [9] Garavan, T., Shanahan, V., Carbery, R., & Watson, S. (2016). Strategic human resource development: Towards a conceptual framework to understand its contribution to dynamic capabilities. Human Resource Development International, 19(4), 289-306. [10] Abolfathi, J., Rasouli R., Zamaheni M., & Estiri M. (2019). Identifying dimensions of human resources model based on an approach to high performance work systems (studied case: knowledgebased companies). Journal of Management Researches in Iran, 23(1), 49-74. [11] Alagaraja, M. (2013). Mobilizing organizational alignment through strategic human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 16(1), 74-93. [12] Falola, H. O., Salau, O. P., Olokundun, M. A., Oyafunke-Omoniy, C. O., Ibidunni, A. S., & Oludayo, O. A. (2018). Employees’ intrapreneurial engagement initiatives and its influence on organisational survival. Business: Theory and Practice, 19, 9-16. [13] Park, S., Jeong, S., & Ju, B. (2018). MOOCs in the workplace: an intervention for strategic human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 1-12. [14] Garavan, T. N., & Carbery, R. (1991). Strategic human resource development. Journal of European industrial training, 15(1), 17-30. [15] Clardy, A. (2008). The strategic role of human resource development in managing core competencies. Human resource development international, 11(2), 183-197. [16] Garavan, T. N. (2007). A strategic perspective on human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(1), 11-30. [17] Chen, Y., Tang, G., Jin, J., Li, J., & Paillé, P. (2015). Linking market orientation and environmental performance: The influence of environmental strategy, employee’s environmental involvement, and environmental product quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 479-500. [18] Paillé, P., Chen, Y., Boiral, O., & Jin, J. (2014). The impact of human resource management on environmental performance: An employee-level study. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(3), 451-466. [19] Bartlett, K. R., Johnson, K. R., & Schneider, I. E. (2016). Comparing strategic human resource development approaches for tourism and hospitality workforce planning. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 15(4), 440-461. [20] Buckley, R., & Caple, J. (2009). The theory and practice of training. Kogan Page Publishers. [21] Keep, E. (1989). Corporate training strategies: The vital component. In J. Storey (Ed.), New perspectives on HRM (109-125). London, UK: Routledge [23] Hsu C. C. and Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1-8. [24] Habibpour Gatabi, K., & Safari Shali, R. (1390). Comprehensive Guide to SPSS Application in Survey Research. Tehran. Motafakeran Publications.
)