نویسنده
استادیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس ، تهران، ایران
چکیده
تیمهای نوآور در اقتصاد کشورها نقش مهمی جهت ایجاد ارزش افزوده در اقتصاد ایفا میکنند. به همین دلیل مورد توجه سرمایهگذاران زیادی هستند به طوری که بسیاری از آنها به جای سرمایه گذاری بر ایدهها بر روی تیمهای نوآور سرمایهگذاری میکنند. این پژوهش با هدف طراحی و ارائه چارچوب مفهومی جهت ارزشگزاری تیمهای استارتآپی و نوآور انجام شده است. پژوهش از لحاظ هدف توسعهای- کاربردی، از نظر ماهیت اکتشافی و از نظر گردآوری دادهها آمیخته ازنوع اکتشافی میباشد. جامعهی پژوهش در بخش کیفی 17 نفر از مدیران و صاحبنظران شرکتهای سرمایهگذاری، سرمایهگذاران و کارآفرینان باتجربه و موفق بوده و جامعه آماری بخش کمی را نیز 360 نفر از مدیران و کارشناسان شرکتهای سرمایهگذاری و کارآفرینان موفق تشکیل میدهند که از میان آنها 178 نفر به روش نمونهگیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدهاند. ابزار گردآوری دادهها در مرحله کیفی مصاحبه و در بخش کمی پرسشنامه میباشد. تجزیه و تحلیل دادهها در بخش کیفی با روش تحلیل محتوا و در بخش کمی نیز از طریق تحلیل عاملی تاییدی صورت گرفته است. با جمعبندی ادبیات نظری و تجزیه و تحلیل دادهها، معیارهای ارزشگزاری تیمهاینوآور در سه بُعد مکمل انسجام تیمی، یکپارچگی گروهی و شایستگیهای فردی طبقه بندی میشوند که 12 مولفهی مجزا و 80 شاخصِ تایید شده، این معیارها را تشکیل میدهند.
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Conceptual framework design for valuing innovative teams (start-up)
نویسنده [English]
- amir colabi
چکیده [English]
Innovative teams in the economies of countries play an important role in creating added value in the economy. For this reason, they are of interest to many investors, so many of them invest in innovative teams instead of investing in ideas. The present study is in terms of development-applied purpose, in terms of exploratory nature. The research population in the qualitative section is 17 experienced and successful managers of investment companies, investors and entrepreneurs, and the statistical population of the quantitative section consists of 360 managers and experts of successful investment companies and entrepreneurs. 178 people were selected by simple random sampling. The data collection tool is in the qualitative stage of the interview and in the quantitative part is a questionnaire. Data analysis was performed in the qualitative part by content analysis method and in the quantitative part by confirmatory factor analysis. By summarizing the theoretical literature and analyzing the data, the evaluation criteria of innovative teams are classified into three dimensions: team cohesion, group integration, and individual competencies. Also, 12 separate components and 80 approved indicators constitute these criteria.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- Valuation of startup teams
- Innovative teams
- Start-up
- Start-up businesses
- [1] Akkaya, M. Startup Valuation: Theories, Models, and Future. In Valuation Challenges and Solutions in Contemporary Businesses. IGI Global, (2020), (1): 137-156. [2] Munoz-Bullon, F., Sanchez-Bueno, M. J., & Vossaz, A. Startup team contributions and new firm creation: the role of founding team experience. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, (2015), 27(12): 80-105. [3] Soleimani, N., Aghdasi, M., Ostadi, B. Presentation of mathematical formula in Employee Value. Modern Research in Decision Making, (2019), 4(1): 101-118. [4] Miloud, T., Aspelund, A., & Cabrol, M. Startup valuation by venture capitalists: an empirical study. Venture Capital, (2012), 14(2-3): 151-174. [5] Nadafi, R., Ahmadvand, M. Identification and Prioritization of Development Factors of Startups Using Q methodology. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, (2017), 10(3): 517-534. [6] Nemati S, Khaef Elahi A A, DanaeeFard H. Developing Public Sector Human Resource Value Creation Measurment Model. IQBQ. (2017), 21(2): 157-178 [7] Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M., & Pearce, C. L. The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. The leadership quarterly, (2006), 17(3): 217-231. [8] Klotz, A. C., Hmieleski, K. M., Bradley, B. H., & Busenitz, L. W. New venture teams: A review of the literature and roadmap for future research. Journal of management, (2014), 40(1): 226-255. [9] Dehghan-Eshratabad M, Albadvi A. Applying real option approach for startup valuation by venture capitalists in first round of financing. IQBQ. (2018), 22 (3): 1-27 [10] Smart, G. H. Management assessment methods in venture capital: An empirical analysis of human capital valuation. The Journal of Private Equity, (2000), 2(3): 29–45. [11] De Oliveira, F. B., & Zotes, L. P. Valuation methodologies for business startups: a bibliographical study and survey. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, (2018), 15(1): 96-111. [12] Woolley, A. W., Aggarwal, I., and Malone, T. W. Collective intelligence and group performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, (2015), 24(6): 420–424. [13] Hudakova, J. Startups support in Slovak republic. Management, (2019), 7(1): 63-69. [14] Ries, E. The lean startup: How today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Currency. (2011), 108-119. [15] Davis, A. E., Aldrich, H. E., & Longest, K. C. Resource drain or process gains? Team status characteristics and group functioning among startup teams. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, (2009), 29(11): 2-24. [16] Hyytiainen, J. The "means" that matter: Transforming ideas into promising business opportunities. Master’s thesis, Aalto University. (2014) [17] Franke, N., Gruber, M., Harhoff, D., and Henkel, J. Venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams: Trade-offs, knock-out criteria, and the impact of vc experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, (2008), 32(3):459–483. [18] Nasser, S. Valuation for startups—9 methods explained. ICT Strategic Consulting. (2016), 2-18. [19] Baum, J. A. and Silverman, B. S. Picking winners or building them? alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. Journal of business venturing, (2004), 19(3): 411–436. [20] Amri-Asrami M, Aghaei M. The Dynamics of Accounting Information in Stock Valuation: An Industry-Based Analysis. IQBQ. (2017), 21(1) :29-63 [21] Ensley, M. D. and Pearson, A. W. An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, (2005), 29(3):267–284. [22] Maschke, K. and zu Knyphausen-Aufseb, D. How the entrepreneurial top management team setup influences firm performance and the ability to raise capital: A literature review. Business Research, (2012), 5(1): 83–123. [23] Rozovsky, J. The five keys to a successful google team. (2015), 3-26. [24] Tekleab, A. G., Quigley, N. R., and Tesluk, P. E. A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, (2009), 34(2): 170–205. [25] Wang, D., Waldman, D., and Zhang, Z. A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. The Journal of applied psychology, (2014), 99(2): 181–198. [26] Mol, E., Khapova, S. N., and Elfring, T. Entrepreneurial team cognition: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, (2015), 17(2): 232–255. [27] De Jong, B. A., Dirks, K. T., and Gillespie, N. Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. Journal of Applied Psychology, (2016), 101(8): 11-34. [28] Ellonen, R., Blomqvist, K., and Puumalainen, K. The role of trust in organizational innovativeness. European Journal of Innovation Management, (2008), 11(2): 160–181. [29] Pearce, C. L., Gallagher, C. A., and Ensley, M. D. Confidence at the group level of analysis: A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between potency and team effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, (2002), 75(1): 115–119. [30] Bazargan A. (2012). An Introduction to qualitative and mixed research methods, Tehran, Didar.
)