نویسندگان
1 استادیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه خلیج فارس، بوشهر، ایران
2 استادیار، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه خلیج فارس، بوشهر، ایران
چکیده
امروزه، زندگی بشر به‌طور فزآینده‌ای شبیه به بازی‌ها شده است؛ نه تنها به این دلیل که بازی‌ها به بخشی گسترده‌ای از زندگی انسان تبدیل شده‌اند؛ بلکه فعالیت‌ها، سیستم‌ها و خدمات نیز به‌طور فزآینده‌ای بازیگونه شده‌اند. بنابراین، چالش کلیدی سازمانها در عصر دیجیتال کنونی استفاده از سیستمهای بازیگونه جهت ارتقاء انگیزه و مهارت کاربران میباشد. هدف این پژوهش، تحلیل و ارزیابی سیستمهای مدیریت یادگیری از منظر قابلیتهای بازیوار است. این تحقیق، به لحاظ هدف، در زمره تحقیقات کاربردی و به لحاظ روش، در قالب تحقیقات کیفی- کمی است. در گام نخست، با مطالعه و مداقهی مبانی نظری و پیشینه تجربی، و همچنین نظرخواهی از خبرگان، تعداد هفت توانمندساز بازیوار شناسایی گردید که جهت ارزیابی و رتبهبندی تعداد 4 سامانه آموزش مجازی بازیوار مورد استفاده قرار گرفتند. جامعه آماری پژوهش را اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه خلیج فارس تشکیل دادند. تعداد 10 نفر از آنها به عنوان اعضای نمونه با روش نمونهگیری هدفمند قضاوتی انتخاب شدند که از دانش تجربی و تئوریک مناسب در زمینهی بکارگیری و استفاده از سامانههای مورد بررسی برخوردار بودند. ابزار جمعآوری دادهها، پرسشنامهی محققساخته است که روایی آن با روش تحلیل محتوای صوری و پایایی آن نیز با روش ضریب کندال با مقدار 83/0 تأیید گردید. به منظور تجزیه و تحلیل دادهها، از روشهای تلفیقی کریتیک – کوپراس استفاده شده است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد؛ از بین سیستمهای مدیریت یادگیری مورد بررسی؛ سیستم ایسپرینگ بالاترین امتیاز را بدست آورده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Emergence of Motivational Information Systems: âAnalysis and Evaluation of Learning Management Systems âin terms of Gamification â
نویسندگان [English]
- ebrahim rajabpour 1
- Ahmad Ghorbanpur 2
چکیده [English]
Today, human life has become increasingly like games, not just because games have become a big part of human life, but most of the activities, systems and services are game-based. Therefore, the main challenge for organizations in the current digital age is to use skill-based game systems to enhance employee motivation and learning. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the game-based capabilities of learning management systems (LMS). This research, in terms of purpose, is in the field of applied research and in terms of method, in the form of qualitative-quantitative research. In first, a number of seven capabilities were identified by studying theoretical background and empirical background and obtaining expert opinions. The statistical population of the study includes professors as well as administrators and experts. The number of ten of them were selected as sample members. Data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire whose validity was confirmed by content analysis method and its reliability by Kendallchr(chr('39')39chr('39'))s coefficient. To analyze the data was used the CRITIC-COPRAS approach. The results show that among the four types of learning management system studied, iSpring LMS received the highest score. Finally, discussion and conclusions are presented.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Gamification
- Information Systems
- Learning Management Systems
- CRITIC
- COPRAS.
- [1] Rodrigues, L. F., Oliveira, A., & Rodrigues, H. (2019). Main gamification concepts: A systematic mapping study. Heliyon, 5(7), 1-13. [2] Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O'Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In CHI'11 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2425-2428). [3] Leclercq, T., Poncin, I., & Hammedi, W. (2020). Opening the black box of gameful experience: Implications for gamification process design. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101882. [ 4] Baptista, G., & Oliveira, T. (2019). Gamification and serious games: A literature meta-analysis and integrative model. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 306-315. [5] Nah, F. F. H., Zeng, Q., Telaprolu, V. R., Ayyappa, A. P., & Eschenbrenner, B. (2014). Gamification of education: a review of literature. In International conference on hci in business (pp. 401-409). Springer, Cham. [ 6] Hakak, S., Noor, N. F. M., Ayub, M. N., Affal, H., Hussin, N., & Imran, M. (2019). Cloud-assisted gamification for education and learning–Recent advances and challenges. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 74, 22-34. [7] Wong, S., Giessner, S., Van Ballen, C., & Roufanis, V. (2017). Using new ways of working to attract millennials. Communication for Leaders, 2017(1), 24-25. [8] Küpper, D. M., Klein, K., & Völckner, F. (2019). Gamifying employer branding: An integrating framework and research [9] Cardador, M. T., Northcraft, G. B., & Whicker, J. (2017). A theory of work gamification: Something old, something new, something borrowed, something cool? Human Resource Management Review, 27(2), 353-365. [10] Xi, N., & Hamari, J. (2019). Does gamification satisfy needs? A study on the relationship between gamification features and intrinsic need satisfaction. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 210-221. [11] Hamari, J., & Keronen, L. (2017). Why do people play games? A meta-analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 125-141. [12] Sardi, L., Idri, A., & Fernández-Alemán, J. L. (2017). A systematic review of gamification in e-Health. Journal of biomedical informatics, 71, 31-48. [13] Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 191-210. [14] Majuri, J., Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2018). Gamification of education and learning: A review of empirical literature. In Proceedings of the 2nd International GamiFIN Conference, GamiFIN 2018. CEUR-WS. [15] Baydas, O., & Cicek, M. (2019). The examination of the gamification process in undergraduate education: a scale development study. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1-17. [16] Sanchez, D. R., Langer, M., & Kaur, R. (2020). Gamification in the classroom: Examining the impact of gamified quizzes on student learning. Computers & Education, 144, 103666. [17] Silva, R. J. R. D., Rodrigues, R. G., & Leal, C. T. P. (2019). Gamification in Management Education: A Systematic Literature Review. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 16(2). [18] Toda, A. M., do Carmo, R. M., da Silva, A. P., Bittencourt, I. I., & Isotani, S. (2019). An approach for planning and deploying gamification concepts with social networks within educational contexts. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 294-303. [19] Aparicio, A. F., Vela, F. L. G., Sánchez, J. L. G., & Montes, J. L. I. (2012, October). Analysis and application of gamification. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Interacción Persona-Ordenador (p. 17). ACM. [20] Bourgonjon, J., Valcke, M., Soetaert, R., & Schellens, T. (2010). Students’ perceptions about the use of video games in the classroom. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1145-1156. [21] Wakefield, R. L., Wakefield, K. L., Baker, J., & Wang, L. C. (2011). How website socialness leads to website use. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 118-132. [22] Kusuma, G. P., Wigati, E. K., Utomo, Y., & Suryapranata, L. K. P. (2018). Analysis of gamification models in education using MDA framework. Procedia Computer Science, 135, 385-392. [23] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. [24] Sailer, M., Hense, J., Mandl, J., & Klevers, M. (2013). Psychological perspectives on motivation through gamification. Interaction Design and Architecture Journal, (19), 28-37. [25] Liu, Y., Alexandrova, T., & Nakajima, T. (2011). Gamifying intelligent environments. In Proceedings of the 2011 international ACM workshop on Ubiquitous Meta user interfaces, ACM, 7-12. [26] Kim, T. W. (2018). Gamification of Labor and the Charge of Exploitation. Journal of business ethics, 152(1), 27-39. [27] Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. [28] Marathe, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2011). What drives customization: control or identity? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, 781-790. [29] Abbasi Esfanjani, H., & Forouzandeh Dehkordi, L. (2014). Identify and Explanation the Factors that Affects in Commercialization of University Research Using Triangulation Model. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 6(4), 33-46. [30] Jalal, R., Kazemi, A., Ansari, A. (2018). Designing a Brand Performance Model for Banking Services Market Based on Customer-Based Brand Equity. IQBQ. 22 (3) :104-132 [31] Mohamed Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R. (2020). A novel plithogenic TOPSIS- CRITIC model for sustainable supply chain risk management. Journal of Cleaner Production,247, 119586 [32] Ghorbanpour, A., Pooya, A., Nazemi, S., Azimi, N. (2017). Assessing Green Supply Chain Management Practices in the Field of Iran's Oil Industries (FISM_FANP Hybrid Approach). Modern Research in Decision Making, 2(3), 267-288. [33] Bagherzadeh Azar, M., Dorri, B. (2011). Applying ANP in Selecting the Best Supplier in Supply Chain. IQBQ.14 (4):27-47. [34] Pitchipoo, P., Vincent, D.S., Rajini, N., Rajakarunakarand, S.(2014). COPRAS Decision Model to Optimize Blind Spot in Heavy Vehicles: A Comparative Perspective. Procedia Engineering, 97, 1049-1059 [35] Divsalar, M., Safaei Ghadikolaei, A., Madhoushi, M. (2017). Extension of the DANP decision making method based on interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Modern Research in Decision Making, 2(3), 123-145.
)