مطالعه تطبیقی تاثیر ادغام بر مشروعیت سازمانی و هویت‌ سازمانی کارکنان

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

2 عضو هیأت علمی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

ادغام از مهم‌ترین تغییراتی است که سازمان‌ها تجربه می‌کنند. این تغییر می‌تواند بر سایر متغیرهای مهم در سازمان اثر گذارد. هدف از انجام این پژوهش، مطالعه تأثیر ادغام سازمان­ها بر مشروعیت سازمانی و هویت یابی کارکنان با سازمان در کارکنان وزارت تعاون، کار و رفاه اجتماعی است. در این راستا تغییرات متغیرهای هویت یابی کارکنان با سازمان و مشروعیت سازمان، پیش و پس از ادغام مورد سنجش قرار گرفت. در این پژوهش، علاوه بر تأثیر ادغام بر مشروعیت سازمان و هویت یابی کارکنان با سازمان، تأثیر آن بر ادراک هویت دوجنبه­ای، هویت خنثی و عدم احراز هویت با سازمان نیز بررسی شد. بعلاوه تأثیر مشروعیت سازمانی بر هویت یابی کارکنان با سازمان و هر یک از حالت­های نام برده مدل بسط یافته در مرحله‌ پس از ادغام بررسی شد و در نهایت راهکارهایی جهت افزایش هویت و مشروعیت کارکنان در یک سازمان ادغام شده، ارائه شده است. نتایج حاصل از پژوهش نشان می­دهد که در این وزارتخانه، مشروعیت سازمان و هویت یابی کارکنان با سازمان پس از ادغام در مقایسه با قبل از ادغام، کاهش معناداری داشته است. همچنین با مطالعه‌ نتایج بدست آمده از مرحله پس از ادغام، مشخص شد که مشروعیت سازمان، تأثیر مثبت برهویت سازمانی دارد و هویت خنثی، دوجنبه­ ای و عدم احراز هویت را کاهش می­ دهد .  

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparative Study of the Effect of Merger on Organizational Legitimacy and Organizational Identification

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sahar Alisoltani 1
  • Ahmad Aali 1
  • Tayebe Amirkhani 2
چکیده [English]

Merger is one of the most important changes that organizations experience. This change can have many effects and different aspects. The purpose of this research, is examination of the effect of merger on organizational identification and organizational legitimacy. Our society is the Ministry of Cooperatives labour and social welfare. In this regard, changes of organizational identification and organizational legitimacy before and after the merger have been studied. In this research, organizational identification has been studied based on expanded model of organizational identification (Misidentification, Ambivalent Identification & Neutral Identification); this means that the effect of merger on these types of organizational identification has been studied. In addition the impact of organizational legitimacy on organizational identification and misidentification, ambivalent identification & neutral identification, after merger has been studied. Finally the solutions for improving organizational identification have been presented based on the results.  
The results of the research show that in the ministry, the organizational legitimacy and organizational identification decreased significantly after the merger compared to before the merger, but misidentification, and ambivalent identification have increased significantly, although the changes of neutral identification was not significant. Based on the results of the post-merger phase, it was revealed that organizational legitimacy has a direct impact on organizational identification and has an inverse impact on the 3 types of organizational identification based on expanded model of organizational identification.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Organizational Legitimacy
  • Organizational Identification
  • Merger
  • Expanded Identification Model

مراجع

  1. ‎ [1] MacLean, T. L., & Webber, S. S. (2015). Navigating multiple identities across multiple ‎boundaries: A cross-level model of organizational‏ ‏identification. Journal of Management ‎Inquiry, 24(2), 156-173.‎ ‎[2] Elstak, M. N., Bhatt, M., Van Riel, C. B., Pratt, M. G., & Berens, G. A. (2015). Organizational ‎identification during a merger: The role of self‐enhancement and uncertainty reduction motives ‎during a major organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 52(1), 32-62. ‎ ‎[3] Amiot, C. E., Terry, D. J., Jimmieson, N. L., & Callan, V. J. (2006). A longitudinal ‎investigation of coping processes during a merger: Implications for job satisfaction and ‎organizational identification. Journal of Management, 32(4), 552-574.‎ ‎[4] Bartels, J., Douwes, R., De Jong, M., & Pruyn, A. (2006). Organizational identification during ‎a merger: Determinants of employees' expected identification with the new organization. ‎British Journal of Management, 17(S1), S49-S67. ‎ ‎[5] Yi, X., & Uen, J. F. (2006). Relationship between organizational socialization and ‎organization identification of professionals: Moderating effects of personal work experience ‎and growth need strength. Journal of American Academy of Business, 10(1), 362-372.‎ ‎[6] Sillince, J. A., & Brown, A. D. (2009). Multiple organizational identities and legitimacy: The ‎rhetoric of police websites. Human Relations, 62(12), 1829-1856. ‎ ‎[7] Terry, D. J., O’Brien, A. T. (2001). Status, legitimacy, and ingroup bias in the context of an ‎organizational merger. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4(3), 271-289.‎ ‎[8] Sinha‏, ‏P., Daellenbach, U., & Bednarek, R. (2015). Legitimacy defense during post-merger ‎integration: Between coupling and compartmentalization. Strategic Organization, 13(3), 169-‎‎199.‎ ‎[9] Sepahvand, R., Aref nejad, M., Shariat Nejad, A.(2017). Identification and Prioritization of ‎Factors Causing Organizational Inertia Using Delphi Fuzzy Method, Modern Researches in ‎decision making, 2(1), 95-118. ‎ ‎[10] Dhalla, R. (2007). The construction of organizational identity: Key contributing external ‎and intra-organizational factors. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(4), 245-260.‎ ‎[11] Empson, L. (2004). Organizational identity change: managerial regulation and member ‎identification in an accounting firm acquisition. Organizations and Society, 29(8), 759-781.‎ ‎[12] He, H., & Baruch, Y. (2010). Organizational identity and legitimacy under major ‎environmental changes: Tales of two UK building societies. British Journal of Management, ‎‎21(1), 44-62.‎ ‎[13] Cho, B., Lee, D., & Kim, K. (2014). How does relative deprivation influence employee ‎intention to leave a merged company? The role of organizational identification. Human ‎Resource Management, 53(3), 421-443. ‎ ‎[14] Jalili,e., Moshabaki, A., Khodadah Hoseini, S.H., Azar, A.(2019). Designing the ‎Model of Implementation of Integration Strategy of Public Organizations in Iran, 23(2), ‎‎151-181. ‎ ‎[15] Lupina‐Wegener, A., Drzensky, F., Ullrich, J., & van Dick, R. (2014). Focusing on the bright ‎tomorrow? A longitudinal study of organizational identification and projected continuity in a ‎corporate merger. British Journal of Management, 53(4), 752-772. ‎ ‎[16] Schraeder, M., & Self, D. R. (2003). Enhancing the success of mergers and acquisitions: an ‎organizational culture perspective. Management Decision, 41(5), 511-522. ‎ ‎[17] Ismail, M., Umar Baki, N. (2017). Organizational factors of justice and culture leading to ‎organizational identification in merger and acquisition. European Journal Of Training and ‎Development, 41(8), 687-704. ‎ ‎[18] Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Lemmer, G. (2004). Research‏ ‏note: The winds of change—‎Multiple identifications in the case of organizational mergers. European Journal of Work and ‎Organizational Psychology, 13(2), 121-138.‎ ‎[19] Millward, l., Kyriakidou, O.(2004). Linking pre- and post-merger identities through the ‎concept of career, Career Development International, 9(1), 12-27. ‎ ‎[20]Aghaz, A., Amirkhani, T.(1387). Organizational Identification after merger, Iranian ‎journal of management sciences, 3(9), 105-130. ‎ ‎[21] Cheney,G (1983). On the various and changing meaning of organizational membership: A ‎field study of organizational identification, Communication Monographs, 50:342-362. ‎ ‎[22] Kreiner, G. E., Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of ‎organizational identification. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 25(1), 1-27. ‎ ‎[23] Kreiner, G. E., Ashforth, B. E., & Sluss, D. M. (2006). Identity dynamics in occupational ‎dirty work: Integrating social identity and system justification perspectives. Organization ‎Science, 17(5), 619-636.‎ ‎[24] Elsbach, K. D., & Bhattacharya, C. (2001). Defining who you are by what you're not: ‎Organizational disidentification and the National Rifle Association. Organization Science, ‎‎12(4), 393-413.‎ ‎[25] Suchman, C.(1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches, The ‎Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.‎ ‎[26] Elsbach, D., Sutton, I.(1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate ‎actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories, The Academy of ‎Management Journal, 35(4), 699-738. ‎ ‎[27] Clegg, S. R., Rhodes, C., & Kornberger, M. (2007). Desperately seeking legitimacy: ‎Organizational identity and emerging industries. Organization Studies, 28(4), 495-513. ‎ ‎[28] Salehi Abarquee, M., Amiri, M., Olfat, L., Feizi, K.(2018). A Framework For Evaluating ‎Organizational Resilience In Iran Leather Industry, Modern Researches in Decision Making, ‎‎3(3), 105-128‎ ‎[29] Mombini, Y., Doostar, M., Goodarzi, M.(2017). Political Intelligence and Organizational ‎Change: Investigating Organizational Culture As Moderator, Management Research in Iran, ‎‎21(2), 113-135. ‎ ‎ [30] Azar, A. Gholamzade, R., Ghanavati, M., Path- Structural Modeling in Management, ‎Negah Danesh Publication, Tehran,139‎‏. ‏
پژوهش های مدیریت در ایران
دوره 24، شماره 2
تیر 1399
صفحه 61-86

فایل ها

اشتراک گذاری

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار