نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و علوم اقتصادی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده مدیریت و علوم اقتصادی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران

چکیده

مدیران سازمان‌ها برای موفقیت در محیط پرتلاطم کنونی نیازمند اتخاذ تصمیم‌های راهبردی جهت اجرای انتقال دانش هستند؛ بدین منظور هدف این پژوهش بررسی نقش تعدیل‌گری یادگیری‌زدایی در ارتباط بین سازگاری دانش جدید و انتقال دانش است. تحقیق حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی، از نظر رویکرد و ماهیت علی- معلولی، از نظر روش گرد‌آوری داده کمی، با رویکرد توصیفی پیمایشی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش کارکنان شاغل در شرکت بسپار استان اصفهان به تعداد 57 نفر است. فرضیات این پژوهش با استفاده از تکنیک مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری مورد آزمون قرار گرفت؛ نتایج نشان داد سازگاری دانش جدید بر انتقال دانش و ابعاد آن (به جز بعد عدم پذیرش) تأثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد. همچنین یادگیری‌زدایی اثر تعدیل‌گری مثبتی در ارتباط بین سازگاری دانش جدید و انتقال دانش دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Studying Unlearning Moderation Role on Relationship between New Knowledge Compatibility and Knowledge Transfer in Knowledge Based Companies

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amir Hooshang nazarpoori 1
  • Neda Shahsiah 2

چکیده [English]

Organizations’ managers need to make strategic decisions to implement knowledge transfer to succeed in current turbulent environment; to this end, the purpose of this research is to study role of unlearning moderation on relationship between new knowledge compatibility and knowledge transfer. This research is applied in terms of objective, causal in terms of approach and nature, quantitative in terms of data collection method, and has a descriptive survey approach. The statistical population of the study consists of 57 employees in Buspar Company, Isfahan. In order to test the research hypotheses, structural equations modeling have been used.  Research findings show positive and significant effect of the new knowledge compatibility on knowledge transfer and its dimensions (except for the misadoption). Moreover, learning outcomes has a positive moderating effect on the relationship between new knowledge adaptation and knowledge transfer.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Unlearning
  • New Knowledge Compatibility
  • Knowledge Transfer
  • knowledge based companies
[1] Petrou, A., & Daskalopoulou, I. Social capital and innovation in the services sector. European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(1), 2013, 50-69. [2] Fauchart, E. Moral Hazard and the Role of Users in Learning from Accidents. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, (2)14, 2006, 97-106. [3] De Holan, P. M., & Phillips, N. Remembrance of things past? The dynamics of organizational forgetting. Management Science, 50(11), 2004, 1603—1613. [4] Tsang, E. W. K., & Zahra, S. Organizational unlearning. Human Relations, 61(10), 2008, 1435-1462. [5] Hedberg, B. How Organizations Learn and Unlearn. In P. Nystrom & W. H.Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design, 1. London: Cambridge, 1981. [6] Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of innovations (5th edition). New York, NY: Free Press, 2003. [7] Leonard-Barton, D., & Sinha, D. K. Developer-user interaction and user satisfaction in internal technology transfer. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 1993, 1125-1139. [8] Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions and Engineering Management, 29(1), 1982, 28-45. [9] Albert, S. & Vicenc, F. Organizational Forgetting in Higher Education. 3rd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management, 2009. [10] Wong, P. S., Cheung, S. O., Yiu, R. L., & Hardie, M. The unlearning dimension of organizational learning in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 30(1), 2012, 94-104. [11] Hoffman, J. J., Hoelscher, M. L., & Sherif, K. Social capital, knowledge management, and sustained superior performance. Journal of knowledge management, 9(3), 2005, 93-100. [12] Polanyi, M. The tacit dimension. New York, NY: Anchor Day Books, 1966. [13] Harzing, A. W. & Noorderhaven, N. Knowledge flows in MNCs: An empirical test and extension of Gupta and Govindarajan’s typology of subsidiary roles. International Business Review, 15, 2006, 195-214. [14] Minbaeva, D. B. Knowledge transfer in multinational corporations. Management International Review, 47(4), 2007, 567-593. [15] Kostova, T., & Roth, K. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 2002, 215-233. [16] Lervik, J. E. B. Managing matters: Transferring organizational practices within multinational corporations. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Norwegian School of Management BI, Oslo, 2005. [17] Argote, L., & Ingram, P. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 2000, 150-169. [18] Emre, Y. & Carl, F. Compatibility and unlearning in knowledge transfer in mergers and acquisitions, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, 2010, 448-456. [19] Bettis, R. A., & Prahalad, C. K. The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 1995, 5-14. [20] Kostova, T. Transnational transfer of organizational practices: A contextual perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 1999, 308-324. [21] Mezias, J. M., Grinyer, P., & Guth, W. D. Changing collective cognition: A process model for strategic change. Long Range Planning, 34, 2001, 71-95. [22] Szulanski, G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the term. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 1996, 27-43. [23] Cooper, J. Cognitive dissonance: Fifty years of a classical theory. Thousand Oaks, CS: Sage, 2007. [24] Ali, D. & Rezazadeh, A. Structural equation modeling with PLS, Jahad University Press, 2013. [25] Birkinshaw, J., Bresman, H., & Ha˚kanson, L. Managing the post-acquisition integration process: How the human integration and task integration processes interact to foster value creation. Journal of Management Studies, 37(3), 2000, 395-425. [26] Yildiz, H.E & Fey, C.F. Compatibility and unlearning in knowledge transfer in mergers and acquisitions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, (2)26, 2010, 448-45 [27] Sheikh Attar, M., Khastar, H., & Yoosefi Zenooz, R. Presentation and Implementation of Prediction Model Based On Business Intelligence for Recognition Oriented Decision Making (Case Study of Crowdfunding Firms). Modern Research in Decision Making, 3(2), 2018, 175-195. [28] Wuensch, K. L. Cronbach’s Alpha and Maximized Lambda4. Core.ecu.edupsycwuenschkmualpha.Doc. 2004. [29] Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS quarterly, 2009, 177-195. [30] Zhao, Y., Lu, Y. & Wang, X. Organizational unlearning and organizational relearning: A dynamic process of knowledge management. Journal of knowledge management, 17, 2013, 902-912. [31] Khadivar, A. & Dortaj, F. Presentation a framework for success in the implementation of knowledge management systems based on cloud computing. Management researches in Iran, 20(2), 2016, 93-118. [32] McKeown, I. Teaching old dogs new tricks: why unlearning matters in SMEs. International journal of entrepreneurship and innovation, 13, 2012, 25-34. [33] Moshabaki, A. & Rabieh, M. Purposeful Organizational Forgetting: Alchemy of Competitiveness in Organization. Management researches in Iran, 13(4) 2010, 194-218.