پژوهش های مدیریت در ایران

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

نقش مؤلفه‌های توانمندسازی روان‌شناختی در پیش‌بینی دلبستگی کاری

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

2 استاد، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

چکیده

دلبستگی کاری یک حالت روانی مثبت است که با تجربه انرژی، مجذوب کار شدن و فداکاری کردن در کار همراه است. هدف این مطالعه بررسی تأثیر توانمندسازی روان‌شناختی و مؤلفه‌های آن بر دلبستگی کاری است. هدف پژوهش کاربردی و ماهیت آن توصیفی- همبستگی است و به‌ شکل مقطعی انجام گرفته است. جامعه آماری این تحقیق کارکنان چند سازمان دولتی در شهر مشهد بودند. از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده استفاده شد و با استفاده از جدول کرجی و مورگان حجم نمونه 384 به‌دست آمد. از 420 پرسش‌نامه توزیع‌شده 389 مورد به شکل کامل گرد‌آوری شد. برای اندازه‌گیری دلبستگی کاری از مقیاس شافیلی، باکر و سالانوا و برای اندازه‌گیری توانمندسازی روان‌شناختی از مقیاس اسپریتز استفاده شد. با استفاده از تحلیل عاملی تأییدی روایی سنجه‌های پژوهش تأیید شد. نتایج آزمون تحلیل مسیر در نرم‌افزار لیزرل نشان داد که توانمندسازی روان‌شناختی %73 از دلبستگی کاری کارکنان را تبیین می‌کند. در حالی که تأثیر احساس شایستگی بر دلبستگی کاری کارکنان معنادار نبود، سایر مؤلفه‌های توانمندسازی روان‌شناختی شامل مؤلفه‌های احساس معناداری، داشتن حق انتخاب و مؤثر بودن بر دلبستگی کارکنان به ترتیب %48، %33 و %38 تأثیر مثبت و معنی‌دار دارند؛ بنابراین توانمندسازی روان‌شناختی یک پیش‌بینی‌کننده قوی برای دلبستگی کاری است. در نتیجه مداخله سازمان‌ها برای افزایش توانمندسازی روان‌شناختی کارکنان تأکید می‌شود. محور این مداخله‌ها باید بر احساس معناداری وظایف، دادن حق انتخاب و مؤثر بودن متمرکز شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Role of Psychological Empowerment Dimensions in Predicting Work Engagement

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Yaqubi 1
  • Normohammad Yaghoubi 2

چکیده [English]

Work engagement is a psychological state experiencing energy, absorption and dedication at work. The purpose of this study is to investigate impact of psychological empowerment and its components on work engagement. This cross sectional study was practical in terms of goal and descriptive-correlational in terms of nature. The statistical population was several public organizations in Mashhad, Iran. A simple random sampling method was applied. Krejcie and Morgan table showed that the suitable sample size is 384. Then, 420 questionnaires were distributed, led to 389 collected completed questionnaires. To measure the work engagement, Schaufeli, Bakker, and Salanova scale, and to measure psychological empowerment, Spreitzer scale were used. Using confirmatory factor analysis, the validity of measures were approved. The results of path analysis in LISREL software showed that psychological empowerment explains 73 percent of the employees' work engagement. While, competence’s effect on work engagement was not statistically significant, other components of psychological empowerment such as meaning, self-determination, and impact, had 48 percent, 33 percent and 38 percent positive and significant effect on the work engagement, respectively. Therefore, psychological empowerment is a significant predictor for work engagement. The results indicate that the organization performs interventions to increase employees' psychological empowerment. The pivot of these interventions should focused on sense of meaning for the tasks, self-determination, and impact.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Work Engagement
  • Psychological Empowerment
  • Job Engagement
مراجع
[1]    Costa, P. L., Passos, A. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2016). The work engagement grid: predicting engagement from two core dimensions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(4), 774 - 789.
[2]    Aon Hewitt. (2015). Trends in global employee engagement. Retrieved 18Dec2016,from http://www.aon.com/ecuador/attachments/engagement2015.pdf
[3]    Jokar, A. & Maleki, M.H. (2017). Proposing a frame work for measuring firms Preparation in terms of succession planning with combination approach of Gray ANP and DEMATEL, Modern Researcheses in Decision Making, 2(1), 73-94 [in Persian]
[4]    Bakker, A. B. (2017). Strategic and proactive approaches to work engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 67-75.
[5]    Reijseger, G., Peeters, M. C., Taris, T. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2016). From Motivation to Activation: Why Engaged Workers are Better Performers. Journal of Business and Psychology, Advance online publication, 1-14.
[6]    Mackay, M. M., Allen, J. A., & Landis, R. S. (2017). Investigating the incremental validity of employee engagement in the prediction of employee effectiveness: A meta-analytic path analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 108-120.
[7]    Lee, Y., Kwon, K., Kim, W., & Cho, D. (2016). Work Engagement and Career: Proposing Research Agendas Through a Review of Literature. Human Resource Development Review, 15(1), 29-54.
[8]    Quiñones, M., Van den Broeck, A. & De Witte, H. (2013). Do job resources affect work engagement via psychological empowerment? A mediation analysis. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 29(3), 127-134.
[9]    Islam, T., Khan, M. M., & Bukhari, F. H. (2016). The role of organizational learning culture and psychological empowerment in reducing turnover intention and enhancing citizenship behavior. The Learning Organization, 23(2/3), 156-169.
[10] Kahn, W. A. (1990). “Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work”. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
[11] Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V. & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3(1), 71-92.
[12] Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The Meaning of Employee Engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30.
[13] Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire a cross-national study. Educational and psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
[14] Babaei Khalaji, M., Ahmadi, S. A. A., & Shahbazi M.(2013). Investigation of the Effective Factors on Employee Engagement of Nurses in Farabi Eye Hospital affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Public Administration, 5(4), 39-56 [in Persian].
[15] Taleghani, G., Pourvali, B., Mohammadi, M., & Dianati, M. (2015). A reflection on job Engagement in view of psychological capital by considering the mediated role of job Burnout. Journal of Public Administration. 7(4), 765-782 [in Persian].
[16] Keshtkaran, A., Kavosi, Z., Gholipour, A., Sohrabi Zadeh, S., & Sharafi, Z. (2012). Work engagement and effective factors among nurses In General Teaching Hospital of Shiraz University Of Medical Sciences. Journal of PAYAVARD SALAMAT, 6(2), 147-156 [in Persian].
[17] Yaghoubi, M., & Yaghoubi. N.,(2015). An Investigation of the Relationship between Work Engagement and Proficiency, Organizational Culture Management. 13(1), 135-156 [in Persian].
[18] May, D.R., Gilson, R.L., & Harter, L.M., (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77 (1), 11–37.
[19] De Klerk, S., & Stander, M. W. (2014). Leadership Empowerment Behaviour, Work Engagement and Turnover Intention: the Role of Psychological Empowerment. Journal of Positive Management, 5(3), 28-45.
[20] Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482.
[20] Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
[21] Stander, M. W., & Rothmann, S. (2010). Psychological empowerment, job insecurity, and employee engagement. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(1), 1-8.
[22] Ugwu, F. O., Onyishi, I. E., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. M. (2014). Linking organizational trust with employee engagement: the role of psychological empowerment. Personnel Review, 43(3), 377-400.

[23] Hasanpour, A., Abbasi, T., & Norouzi, M. (2011). The Survey on the role of transformational ‎leadership in employee empowerment, Management Researcheses in Iran, 15(1), 159-180 [in Persian].

[24] Wallace, J. C., Johnson, P. D., Mathe, K., & Paul, J. (2011). Structural and psychological empowerment climates, performance, and the moderating role of shared felt accountability: a managerial perspective. J Appl Psychol, 96(4), 840-850.
[25] Gagné, M., & Bhave, D. (2011). Autonomy in the workplace: An essential ingredient to employee engagement and well-being in every culture Human autonomy. In V. I. Chirkov, R. M. Ryan, & K . M . Sheldon (Eds.), Human autonomy in cross-cultural context (Vol. 1, pp. 163–187). The Netherlands: Springer.
[26] Coetzer, C., & Rothmann, S. (2007). Job demands, job resources and work engagement of employees in a manufacturing organisation. Southern African Business Review, 11(3), 17-32.
[27] Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., & Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23(5), 679-704.
[28] Kalantari, Kh. (2009). structural equation modeling in social-economic research (Using Lisrel & SIMPLIS), Farhang Saba Publication, first print [in Persian]
[29] Adel, A., & Momeni, M. (2001). Statistics and Its Application in Management, Tehran, Samt Pablication [in Persian].
[30] Bhatnagar, J. (2012). Management of innovation: role of psychological empowerment, work engagement and turnover intention in the Indian context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(5), 928-951.
[31] Jose, G., & Mampilly, S. R. (2014). Psychological Empowerment as a Predictor of Employee Engagement: An Empirical Attestation. Global Business Review, 15(1), 93-104.
[32] Taghipour, A., & Dezfuli, Z. K. (2013). Designing and Testing a Model of Antecedents of Work Engagement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 149-154 [in Persian].
[33] De Villiers, J. R., & Stander, M. W. (2011). Psychological empowerment, work engagement and turnover intention: The role of leader relations and role clarity in a financial institution. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 21(3), 405-412.
[34] Cho, J., Laschinger, H. S., & Wong, C. (2006). Workplace empowerment, work engagement and organizational commitment of new graduate nurses. Nursing Leadership-Academy of Canadian Executive Nurses, 19(3), 43.
[35] Oktug, Z. (2014). Psychological Empowerment: It’s Mediating Effect on the Relationship between Organizational Identification and Work Engagement. World Review of Business Research, 4(2), 304 – 313.
[36] Woods, S. A., & Sofat, J. A. (2013). Personality and engagement at work: the mediating role of psychological meaningfulness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(11), 2203-2210.
[36] Woods, S. A., & Sofat, J. A. (2013). Personality and engagement at work: the mediating role of psychological meaningfulness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(11), 2203-2210.
[37] Amirkhani, T., Sepahvand., R., & Aref Nejad., M. (2014). The practices of human resource management and organizational performance: Considering the role of social capital and psychological capital, Journal of Management Sciences in Iran, 9(34), 105-124 [in Persian].
پژوهش های مدیریت در ایران
دوره 21، شماره 3
آذر 1396
صفحه 243-261
فایل ها
اشتراک گذاری
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار