شناسایی عوامل موثر بر اجرای خط‌مشی‌های توسعه پایدار بر مبنای موفقیت‌های جزئی در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

2 پژوهشگر، مرکز مطالعات مدیریت، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران

4 استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران

10.48311/mri.2026.116741.1833
چکیده
هدف این پژوهش شناسایی عوامل موثر بر اجرای خط مشی های توسعه پایدار بر مبنای موفقیت های جزئی در ایران است؛ روش برحسب هدف، کاربردی و براساس ماهیت، توصیفی- پیمایشی است. پژوهش حاضر با رویکرد کیفی و با استفاده از روش داده بنیاد صورت گرفته است. ابزار گردآوری داده‏ها مصاحبه بود که پرسش‏های آن با مطالعه ادبیات موضوع تهیه و سپس با استفاده از با رویکرد ظاهر شونده(گلیزری) کدگذاری شد. مشارکت کنندگان این پژوهش شامل متخصصان و خبرگان تاثیرگذار در اجرای خط مشی بودند که نمونه گیری به صورت هدفمند و نظری و تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری ادامه پیدا کرد. نتایج نشان داد که عوامل مختلفی در اجرای خط مشی های توسعه پایدار اثرگذار هستند. اما با توجه به مفهوم جدید موفقیت های جزئی و مفهوم توسعه پایدار 36 عامل شناسایی شدند که با توجه به کدگذاری های صورت گرفته به دو عامل اصلی عوامل پیش برنده و عوامل بازدارنده تقسیم شدند. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که دو عامل اصلی شناسایی‌شده، هر یک شامل شش عامل اقتصادی، اجتماعی، فرهنگی، استراتژیک، زیست‌محیطی و سازمانی هستند که در مجموع ۱۸ زیرعامل را در بر می‌گیرند. نتایج تحلیل بیانگر آن است که این عوامل، مؤلفه‌های کلیدی مؤثر بر توسعه پایدار را تشکیل می‌دهند و در چارچوب الگوی پژوهش، به‌عنوان ابعاد اصلی تدوین خط‌مشی‌های توسعه پایدار شناسایی شدند. همچنین، یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که این عوامل می‌توانند مبنایی برای تحلیل و تدوین خط‌مشی‌های توسعه پایدار، به‌ویژه در کشورهای در حال توسعه از جمله ایران، فراهم آورند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Identifying Key Indicators Influencing the Implementation of Sustainable Development Policies Based on the Small Wins Approach in Iran

نویسندگان English

Mahdi Mortazavi 1
Sirous Keshavarz 2
mahmoud Rahmatollahi 3
Hamed Rahmani 4
1 Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Researcher, Center for Management Studies, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 PhD Student, Department of Public Administration, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
چکیده English

This study aims to identify the factors influencing the implementation of sustainable development policies based on the Small Wins approach in Iran. In terms of purpose, the research is applied, while methodologically it adopts a descriptive qualitative design. The study was conducted using a qualitative approach based on Glaser's emergent grounded theory methodology. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, the protocol for which was developed following a comprehensive review of the relevant literature. The interview data were subsequently analyzed through the coding procedures of Glaser's emergent grounded theory approach. The participants consisted of experts and practitioners with extensive experience in sustainable development policy implementation. Participants were selected using purposive and theoretical sampling, and data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved.The findings revealed that a wide range of factors influence the implementation of sustainable development policies. Drawing upon the concepts of Small Wins and sustainable development, 36 factors were identified through the coding process. These were subsequently classified into two overarching categories: driving factors and barrier factors. The results further indicated that each of these overarching factors comprises six dimensions, namely economic, social, cultural, strategic, environmental, and organizational, encompassing a total of 18 sub-factors. The analysis demonstrates that these factors constitute the key determinants of sustainable development and, within the proposed framework, represent the principal dimensions for the formulation and implementation of sustainable development policies. Furthermore, findings suggest that these factors provide a valuable analytical framework for designing and implementing sustainable development policies, particularly in developing countries such as Iran.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Factors Influencing Policy Implementation
Sustainable Development
Small Wins
Iran
[1] Baghali Aghdam, L., Sadeghi, S. K., & Nobahar, E. (2025). Modeling the smart city of Tabriz in the 2030 horizon: A comprehensive study of environmental, economic, and governance indicators. Urban Economics and Planning, 6(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.22034/uep.2025.501394.1588 [in Persian].
[2] Alvani, M. (2014). Decision Making and Government Policy Formulation. SAMT Publications. [in Persian].
Jorkesh, S., Nazari, R., Taheri, M. (2019). Iran's Elderly Exercise Model: A Data-Driven Approach, Sport Management Studies, Issue 55, pp. 35-58. 10.22089/smrj.2018.6281.2277 [in Persian].
[3] Heydari, R., Beheshti Far, M., and Ziaeddini, M. (2023). Identification and prioritization of failure-reducing actions in the implementation of policies of the Road Maintenance and Transportation Organization based on the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) technique using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods. Road Quarterly, 1(21), pp. 91-108. https://doi.org/10.22034/road.2022.347657.2058 [in Persian].
[4] Heydari, R., Beheshti Far, M., and Ziaeddini, M. (2023). Identification and prioritization of actions to reduce policy implementation failures in the Road Maintenance and Transportation Organization based on Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) technique using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods. Road Quarterly, 1(21), pp. 91-108. https://doi.org/10.22034/road.2022.347657.2058 [in Persian].
[5] Soltani Pour, F., Damari, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Status in Iran, Journal of Health and Institute of Health Research, 14(4), pp. 1-14. http://sjsph.tums.ac.ir/article-1-5446-fa.html.[in Persian].
[6] Sohrabi, D., Behlouli, N., & Bigzadeh, Y. (2025). Modeling the restructuring of the macro-government in Iran based on the good governance approach and the United Nations development program. Education, Training and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 1–17. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.61838/jtesd.184 [in Persian].
[7] Ansell, C., Gash, A., (2007), Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 18, pp. 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.
[8] Arispe, Sergio A., Johnson, Dustin D., Wollstein, Katherine L., April, Hulet, K. , Jensen, Scott, Schultz, Brad W., Sprinkle, J. E., Michele F., Ryan, T., Mackenzie, M., Cunningham, S. (2023). Strategic Partnerships to Leverage Small Wins for Fine Fuels Management, Rangeland Ecology & Management, Vol. 89, pp. 94-103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2023.01.012.
[9] Baum, S.D. (2019). A Survey of Artificial General Intelligence Projects for Ethics, Risk, and Policy. Global Catastrophic Risk Institute Working Paper, pp. 17-1, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=3070741.
[10] Birkland, T., (2015). An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making, Published by Routledge Press, New York,3rd Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351023948
[11] Cristóbal, J., Ehrenstein, M., Domínguez-Ramos, A., Galán-Martín Ángel, P., Carlos, M., María, A., Rubén, J., Laureano, Á., Irabien, G. (2021), Unraveling the links between public spending and Sustainable Development Goals: Insights from data envelopment analysis, Science of the Total Environment, 786 (2021), pp. 147459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147459
[12] Grin, J., Rotmans, J., Schot, J.W. (2010). Transitions to Sustainable Development. Ebrary, Inc. Routledge, New York (Routledge), https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856598
[13] Johnstone, P., Rogge, K.S., Kivimaa, P., Fratini, C.F., Primmer, E., Stirling, A., (2020). Waves of disruption in clean energy transitions: sociotechnical dimensions of system disruption in Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science. 59, 101287, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101287.
[14] Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2018). Barriers to the circular economy: evidence from the European Union (EU). Ecological Economics, 150, pp. 264-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028
[15] Kohler, ¨ J., Geels, F.G., Kern, F., Wells, P., (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: state of the art and future directions. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 31, pp. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.
[16] Kozioł-Nadolna, K., Beyer, K. (2021), Barriers to innovative activity in the sustainable development of public sector organizations, Procedia Computer Science, 192 (2021), pp. 4376–4385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.214
[17] Markey, K. Tilki, M. Taylor, G. (2020).  Practicalities in doctorate research of using grounded theory methodology in understanding nurses’ behaviours when caring for culturally diverse patients, Nurse Education in Practice, pp. 1-23 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102751..
[18] Reijnders, B. (2021), Small wins triggering the sustainability transition of the Dutch construction industry, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/135
[19] Salo, H. H., Berg, A., Korhonen-Kurki, K., Lahteenoja, S. (2022), Small wins enhancing sustainability transformations: Sustainable development policy in Finland, Environmental Science and Policy, 128 (2022), pp. 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.11.024
[20] Strauss, A. Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[21] Subroto A. (2011). Understanding Complexities in Public Policy Making Process Through Policy Cycle Model: A System Dynamics Approach. Universitas Indonesia, Graduate School of Management Research Paper No. 13-07, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1992756
[22] Termeer, C. J., & Dewulf, A. (2018). A small wins framework to overcome the evaluation paradox of governing wicked problems. Policy and Society, 38(2), pp. 298-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1497933
[23] Termeer, C.J.A.M., Metze, T.A.P. (2019), More than peanuts: Transformation towards a circular economy through a small-wins governance framework, Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118272
[24] Weick, K.E. (1984), Small wins: redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist. 39(1), pp. 40–49. 10.1037/0003-066X.39.1.40.
Fuldauer, L. I., Thacker, S., Haggis, R. A., Fuso-Nerini, F., Nicholls, R. J., & Hall, J. [25] W. (2022). Targeting climate adaptation to safeguard and advance the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications, 13, 3579. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31202-w
[26] Thacker, S., et al. (2021). Informing national adaptation for sustainable development through spatial systems modelling. Global Environmental Change, 71, 102396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102396
[27] Zhou, Y., Clarke, A., & Cairns, S. (2022). Toward Achieving Local Sustainable Development: Market-Based Instruments (MBIs) for Localizing UN Sustainable Development Goals. Urban Science, 6(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci6010024