پژوهش های مدیریت در ایران

مدلسازی پیشران‌های محیطی موثر بر توانمندسازی شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان در بازارهای بین‌المللی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

خدیجه عزیزی 1
بیژن رضایی 2
یوسف محمدی فر 2
نادر نادری 2

1 دانشجوی دکتری کارآفرینی، گروه مدیریت و کارآفرینی، دانشکده اقتصاد و حسابداری، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت و کارآفرینی، دانشکده اقتصاد و حسابداری، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران.

10.48311/mri.2026.28896
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر با هدف مدل‌سازی پیشران‌های محیطی مؤثر بر توانمندسازی شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان برای ورود و حضور پایدار در بازارهای بین‌المللی انجام شده است. این پژوهش بر اساس نظریه قابلیت‌های پویا و رویکردهای تحلیل محیط کلان و صنعتی، از روش آمیخته (کیفی-کمی) بهره گرفته است. در مرحله نخست، با استفاده از روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی استقرایی و انجام ۳۴ مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته با مدیران شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان، سیاست‌گذاران و خبرگان اکوسیستم نوآوری، پیشران‌های محیطی شناسایی و در قالب ۹ مقوله اصلی دسته‌بندی شدند. در مرحله دوم، به‌منظور اعتبارسنجی و اولویت‌بندی پیشران‌ها، روش دلفی فازی با مشارکت ۲۰ نفر از خبرگان دانشگاهی و اجرایی انجام شد. یافته‌های پژوهش بر اساس میانگین قطعی محاسبات فازی نشان داد که مقوله «طراحی و استقرار مکانیسم‌های مالی و اقتصادی حاکمیتی» با امتیاز (0.8661) بالاترین اهمیت را دارد. همچنین، شاخص‌های «طراحی مکانیسم‌های مالی جایگزین برای مقابله با تحریم‌ها» (0.8917) و «توسعه ابزارهای فین‌تک صادرات‌محور» (0.8833) در رتبه‌های نخست قرار گرفتند. پس از آن، مقوله‌های «سیاست‌گذاری تجاری و برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی ملی» و «توسعه دیپلماسی و روابط بین‌الملل» بیشترین اولویت را کسب کردند، در حالی که ابعاد مرتبط با پایداری و تجارت سبز در شرایط کنونی اولویت پایین‌تری داشتند. در مجموع، یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد توانمندسازی بین‌المللی شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان فرایندی چندسطحی است که از تعامل میان پیشران‌های محیطی و قابلیت‌های سازمانی شکل می‌گیرد. بر این اساس، پیشران‌های مالی و سیاستی زمینه حس‌گری فرصت‌ها، زیرساخت‌های فناورانه و دیپلماسی اقتصادی امکان تصاحب فرصت‌های بین‌المللی و توسعه اکوسیستم نهادی ظرفیت بازپیکربندی منابع و قابلیت‌ها را برای افزایش تاب‌آوری شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان در محیط‌های پرتلاطم فراهم می‌سازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

پیشران‌های محیطی
بازارهای بین‌المللی
شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان
توانمندسازی
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Modeling Environmental Drivers Affecting the Empowerment of Knowledge-Based Firms in International Markets.

نویسندگان English

khadijeh azizi 1
bijan rezaee 2
Yosef mohamadifar 2
nader naderi 2
1 PhD student in Entrepreneurship, Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Economics and Accounting, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Corresponding Author, Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Economics and Accounting, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
چکیده English

This study develops a model of environmental drivers influencing the empowerment of knowledge-based companies (KBCs) for entry into and sustainable participation in international markets. Grounded in dynamic capabilities theory and informed by macro- and industry-level environmental perspectives, the research adopts a mixed-methods design. In the qualitative phase, inductive content analysis was conducted based on 34 semi-structured interviews with managers of knowledge-based firms, policymakers, and experts in the innovation ecosystem, leading to the identification and categorization of environmental drivers into nine principal themes. In the quantitative phase, a Fuzzy Delphi approach was employed with a panel of 20 academic and executive experts to validate and prioritize the identified factors. The results indicate that “Designing and Implementing Governmental Financial and Economic Mechanisms” is the most influential category (defuzzified score = 0.8661), while at the indicator level, “Designing Alternative Financial Mechanisms to Counter Sanctions” (0.8917) and “Developing Export-Oriented Fintech Tools” (0.8833) are among the highest-ranked factors, followed by “Trade Policy-Making and National Strategic Planning” and “Strengthening Diplomacy and International Relations” , whereas sustainability-oriented and green trade dimensions receive comparatively lower priority under current conditions. Overall, the findings suggest that the international empowerment of KBCs is a multi-layered process shaped by the interaction of environmental drivers and organizational capabilities, where financial and policy mechanisms appear to shape the sensing of international opportunities, technological infrastructures and economic diplomacy facilitate opportunity seizing, and institutional ecosystem development strengthens the transformation of resources and capabilities, collectively enhancing the resilience of KBCs in volatile international environments.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Environmental Drivers
International Markets
Knowledge-Based Firms
Empowerment
[1] soleimani,R. , esmaeilpour,R. , Akbari,M. and Ebrahimpour,M. (2021). Designing a strategic model for the transnational presence of Iranian knowledge-based firms in foreign markets. Management Research in Iran, 25(1), 216-237. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.2322200.1400.25.1.10.0. [In Persian[
[2] Yang, G. (2024). Knowledge element relationship and value co-creation in the innovation ecosystem. Sustainability, 16(10), 4273. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104273
[3] Payandeh,R and Faghani,S A R . (2025). Interpretive Structural Modeling of Export Development Strategies for Knowledge-Based Companies. Modern Research in Decision Making, 10(3), 1-29. https://journal.saim.ir/article_727983.html?lang=en. [In Persian[
[4] Esmaeilpour, R., Soleimani, R., Akbari, M., and Ebrahimpor, M. (2020). Designing a Strategic Model for Internationalization of Iranian Knowledge Based Enterprises. Journal of International Business Administration, 3(1), 83-108. https://doi.org/10.22034/jiba.2020.10382 .[In Persian[
[5] Foroudi, P., Gupta, S., Patel, P., Batsakis, G., Vaatanen, J., & Czinkota, M. (2023). The effect of home country characteristics on the internationalization of EMNEs: The moderating role of knowledge stock. International Business Review, 32(2), 101893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101893
[6] Tajeddin, M., Farashahi, M., Moghaddam, K., Simba, A., & Edwards, G. (2023). Internationalization of emerging economy SMEs: a tripod approach. Journal of International Management, 29(1), 100991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2022.100991
[7]. Ramezanpour Nargesi,G , fallah haghighi,N and Sharifi,Z . (2022). The factors affecting the success of knowledge-based companies (The case of: The incubators of Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology and the Science and Technology Park of Guilan Province). Innovation Management Journal, 11(3), 91-117. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23225386.1401.11.3.5.1 .[In Persian[
[8] Feng, J., & Qi, S. (2024). Digital infrastructure expansion and economic growth in Asian countries. Journal of Business and Economic Options, 7(2), 27-32. http://resdojournals.com/index.php/jbeo/article/view/356
[9] Levkovich, L. L. (2022). Applied models for developing worldwide internationalism, competitiveness and human capital trade (the case of Singapore & Finland). Vector European, (02), 65-69. https://doi.org/10.52507/2345-1106.2022-2.13
[10] Zhang, C., Zheng, W., Hong, J., & Kafouros, M. (2022). The role of government policies in explaining the internationalization of Chinese firms. Journal of Business Research, 141, 552-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.056
[11] Marczewska, M., & Weresa, M. A. (2023). National Innovation Systems, Knowledge Resources and International Competitiveness. In International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations (pp. 101-114). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34045-1_10
[12] Hilmersson, F. P., & Hilmersson, M. (2021). Networking to accelerate the pace of SME innovations. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(1), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2020.10.001
[13] Terán-Bustamante, Antonia, Antonieta Martínez-Velasco, and Andrée Marie López-Fernández. "University–industry collaboration: a sustainable technology transfer model." Administrative Sciences 11, no. 4 (2021): 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11040142
[14] Hosseini, A., Aryankia, M. (2025). Drivers and Scenarios of Spatial Business Development in Iran: A Futures Studies Approach with an Emphasis on Spatial Planning. Spatial Planning, 15(1), 109-140. https://doi.org/10.22108/sppl.2025.142467.1805. [In Persian[
[15] Rezaei, M., Ferraris, A., Heydari, E., & Rezaei, S. (2021). How do experts think? An investigation of the barriers to internationalisation of SMEs in Iran. In Empirical international entrepreneurship (pp. 337-357). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68972-8_17
[16] Çelik, A. K., Yildiz, T., Aykanat, Z., & Kazemzadeh, S. (2025). Green innovation adoption in Turkish and Iranian SMEs. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(1), 1824-1859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01990-1
[17] World Bank. (2024). High - technology exports (% of manufactured exports). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/tx.val.tech.mf.zs?end=2024&name_desc=false&start=2024  
[18] Phale, K., Li, F., Adjei Mensah, I., Omari-Sasu, A. Y., & Musah, M. (2021). Knowledge-based economy capacity building for developing countries. Sustainability, 13(5), 2890. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052890
[19] Mohammad Kazemi, R., Talebi, K., Davari, A., Dehghan Najmabadi, A. (2021). Designing a Model for Empowering Knowledge-Based SMEs Using DEMATEL. Iranian Journal of Management Sciences, 16(61), 1-16. http://journal.iams.ir/article_345.html?lang=en. [In Persian]
[20] Grant, R., & Phene, A. (2022). The knowledge based view and global strategy. Global Strategy Journal, 12(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1399
[21] Deputy for the Development of Knowledge-Based Companies. (2025). Regulations for the Evaluation of Knowledge-Based Companies and Institutions. https://B2n.ir/py6542
[22] Rezaeinejad, I., Lavrov, S. N., & Simonov, A. G. (2023). Knowledge-based economic development of Iran. 31(4), 814-829. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2023-31-4-814-829
[23] O’Higgins, C., Freije Obregón, I., Calle, A. d. l., & Martínez Zamorano, A. (2022). Barriers to the internationalisation of creative KIBS. Ekonomiaz, 102, 50-73. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8793528
[24] Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831-850. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2247
[25] Teece, D. J. (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328-352. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43822373
[26] Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120 .https://doi. 10.1177/014920639101700108. 6. 10
[27] Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2015). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137508829_7
[28] Talari,M. and pourvali kakhaki,E. (2023). A process model for rapid Internationalization in born global firms. Management Research in Iran, 27(2), 152-181. https://mri.modares.ac.ir/article_627.html?lang=en. [In Persian]
[29] Ghauri, P., Strange, R., & Cooke, F. L. (2021). Research on international business. International Business Review, 30(2), 101794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101794
[30] Yarahmadi, M., & Sadeghi Shahdani, M. (2024). Analysis of Industrial Policy Components. Strategic and Macro Policies, 12(47), 616-654. https://doi:10.30507/jmsp.2023.411777.2625. [In Persian[
[31] Cumming, D. J., & Johan, S. A. (2013). Venture capital and private equity contracting. Academic Press. https://B2n.ir/bu5328
[32] Urbano, D., Aparicio, S., & Audretsch, D. (2019). Institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 53(1), 21-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0038-0
[33] Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266
[34] Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78. https://piazza.com/class_profile/get_resource/iyd2tysc6fj5aa/iyxgbroqf172cb
[35] Rasyad, R. Z., & Mawardah, P. N. (2024). Effective Digital Business Management Strategy. International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology, 4(2), 366-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35870/ijmsit.v4i2.3142
[36] Amdam, R. P., Lunnan, R., Bjarnar, O., & Halse, L. L. (2020). The role of cluster identity. Journal of World Business, 55(5), 101125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101125
[37] Sharifaskari, S., Kabaranzad Ghadim, M. R., Haghighat Monfared, J., & Edalatian Shahriari, J. (2021). Modeling factors affecting international entrepreneurial opportunities recognition. Journal of International Business Administration, 3(4), 67-86. https://www.doi.org/10.22034/jiba.2021.43102.1579 .[In Persian[
[38] Nazari Salari,L , Khadivar,A and Abdolvand,N . (2016). A model for analyzing the barriers of using Business Intelligence (BI) in the tourism industry of Iran, a mixed method approach. Modern Research in Decision Making, 1(1), 79-102. https://journal.saim.ir/article_20709.html?lang=en. [In Persian[
[39] Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115 .https://doi. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
[40] Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE. https://B2n.ir/gh2896
[41] Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1  
[42] Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. P. (2007). Mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=379398
پژوهش های مدیریت در ایران
دوره 30، شماره 1
بهار 1405
صفحه 109-131

صفحه اصلی

ارسال مقاله

تماس با ما