A Novel Network DEA Model Based on the Directional Distance Function for Simultaneous Handling of Negative and Integer-valued Data

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Applied Mathematics, PaM.C., Islamic Azad University, Parsabad Moghan, Iran

10.48311/mri.2026.28272
Abstract
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), as a non-parametric and data-driven methodology, is an effective tool for assessing the relative efficiency of a set of decision-making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs. However, classical DEA models disregard the internal structure of DMUs and treat them as “black boxes.” To overcome this limitation, network DEA has been developed to explicitly model the internal interactions among the components of each DMU. Moreover, in many real-world applications, certain input, output, or intermediate variables are inherently discrete and take integer values, and negative data may also be present. Such characteristics are typically ignored in conventional DEA models and can lead to inaccurate or impractical efficiency estimates. This paper proposes a novel network DEA model based on the directional distance function for two-division series systems, capable of simultaneously handling negative data and integer-valued variables. By defining an appropriate direction vector, the proposed model enables the measurement of system efficiency under both constant returns to scale and variable returns to scale. To demonstrate the capabilities of the proposed model, a real case study involving 29 Iranian supply chains in the medical consumables industry is conducted. The results show that the proposed model not only accurately distinguishes between efficient and inefficient DMUs but also provides projection points that specify the exact pathway for performance improvement in each division. The findings indicate that the proposed approach can serve as a robust and reliable tool for evaluating and enhancing supply chain efficiency, particularly in sensitive industries such as medical consumables.

Keywords


[1]      Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. L. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
[2]      Azizi, H. & Jahed, R. (2015). Supplier Selection in Volume Discount Environments in the Presence of Both Cardinal and Ordinal Data: A New Approach Based On Double Frontiers DEA. Management Research in Iran, 19(3), 191–217. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.2322200.1394.19.3.8.0
[3]      Azizi, H., Amirteimoori, A., & Kordrostami, S. (2018). Measurement of the worst practice of decision-making units: Incorporating both undesirable outputs and non-discretionary inputs into imprecise DEA. Modern Researches in Decision Making, 3(2), 197–222. (In Persian)
[4]      Azizi, H. (2020). New models for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers in the presence of multiple dual-role factors: Data envelopment analysis with double frontiers. Decisions and Operations Research, 5(2), 221–232. (In Persian)
[5]      Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., Lu, W. M., & Lin, B. J. Y. (2013). A survey of DEA applications. Omega, 41(5), 893–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.11.004
[6]      Azizi, H. (2012). Efficiency assessment in data envelopment analysis using efficient and inefficient frontiers. Management Research in Iran, 16(3), 153–173. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.2322200.1391.16.3.8.9
[7]      Mergoni, A., Camanho, A., Soncin, M., Agasisti, T., & De Witte, K. (2026). The influence of School principals’ management on school efficiency: Evidence from Italian schools. European Journal of Operational Research, 329(1), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.06.019
[8]      Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(99)00012-1
[9]      Lovell, C. A. K., Walters, L. C., & Wood, L. L. (1994). Stratified models of education production using modified DEA and regression analysis. In A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin, & L. M. Seiford (Eds.), Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology and applications (pp. 329–351). Kluwer.
[10]    Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management Science, 45(9), 1270–1288. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.9.1270
[11]    Wang, C. H., Gopal, R., & Zionts, S. (1997). Use of data envelopment analysis in assessing information technology impact on firm performance. Annals of Operations Research, 73, 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018977111455
[12]    Färe, R. (1991). Measuring Farrell efficiency for a firm with intermediate inputs. Academia Economic Papers, 19, 329–340.
[13]    Färe, R., & Whittaker, G. (1995). An intermediate input model of dairy production using complex survey data. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 46(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1995.tb00766.x
[14]    Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Economics Letters, 50(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(95)00729-6
[15]    Löthgren, M., & Tambour, M. (1999). Productivity and customer satisfaction in Swedish pharmacies: A DEA network model. European Journal of Operational Research, 115(3), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00177-5
[16]    Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041
[17]    Kao, C., & Liu, S. T. (2011). Efficiencies of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 176(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2011.03.003
[18]    Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2011). Decomposition of technical and scale efficiencies in two-stage production systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 211(3), 515–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.010
[19]    Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Li, N., & Zhu, J. (2009). Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), 1170–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.011
[20]    Kao, C. (2014). Network data envelopment analysis: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.039
[21]    Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., & Lu, W. M. (2016). Research fronts in data envelopment analysis. Omega, 58, 33–45. https://doi.org/j.omega.2015.04.004
[22]    An, Q. X., Wen, Y., Chu, J. F., & Chen, X. H. (2019). Profit inefficiency decomposition in a serial-structure system with resource sharing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(12), 2112–2126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1510810
[23]    Lin, R., & Liu, Q. (2022). Directional distance based efficiency decomposition for series system in network data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(8), 1873–1888. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1931498
[24]    Amirteimoori, A., Azizi, H., & Kordrostami, S. (2020). Double frontier two-stage fuzzy data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 28, 117–152. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488520500063
[25]    Azadi, M., Azizi, H., & Farzipoor Saen, R. (2023). Coordination of public-private transport and sustainability measurement: A futuristic perspective in transport. Journal of Cleaner Production, 420, 138464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138464
[26]    Zhu, W. W., Miao, Z. Y., & Pu, X. J. (2020). Serial network DEA models with a single intermediate measure. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(5), 1168–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1755899
[27]    Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
[28]    Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., & Färe, R. (1998). Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 98(2), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022637501082
[29]    Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
[30]    Portela, M. C. A. S., Thanassoulis, E., & Simpson, G. (2004). Negative data in DEA: A directional distance approach applied to bank branches. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(10), 1111–1121. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601768
[31]    Cheng, G., Zervopoulos, P., & Qian, Z. (2013). A variant of radial measure capable of dealing with negative inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 225(1), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.031
[32]    Kerstens, K., & Van de Woestyne, I. (2014). A note on a variant of radial measure capable of dealing with negative inputs and outputs in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 234(1), 341–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.067
[33]    Lin, R., & Chen, Z. (2017). A directional distance based super-efficiency DEA model handling negative data. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(11), 1312–1322. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0137-8
[34]    Lin, R., & Liu, Y. (2019). Super-efficiency based on the directional distance function in the presence of negative data. Omega, 85, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.05.009
[35]    Lu, Y. H., Chen, P. C., & Hsiao, T. Y. (2014). Operational efficiency in credit departments of farmers’ associations with consideration of non-performing loans and negative values: Application of dynamic network DE. The Macrotheme Review, 3(1), 150–164.
[36]    Izadikhah, M., & Farzipoor Saen, R. (2016). Evaluation sustainability of supply chains by two-stage range directional measure in the presence of negative data. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 49, 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.09.003
[37]    Lin, R., Chen, Z., Hu, Q., & Li, Z. (2017). Dynamic network DEA approach with diversification to multi-period performance evaluation of funds. OR Spectrum, 39(3), 821–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-017-0475-1
[38]    Tavana, M., Izadikhah, M., Caprio, D. D., & Farzipoor Saen, R. (2018). A new dynamic range directional measure for two-stage data envelopment analysis models with negative data. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 115, 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.11.024
[39]    Wanke, P. F., Hadi-Vencheh, A., & Forghani, A. (2018). A DDF based model for efficiency evaluation in two-stage DEA. Optimization Letters, 12(5), 1029–1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-017-1162-5
[40]    Zhang, Z., Liu, H., Gong, Y., & Niu, H. (2026). Evaluating and predicting green economic efficiency in Chinese cities: A three-stage network SBM and machine learning approach. Expert Systems With Applications, 298, 129589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129589
[41]    Peykani, P., Mahmoodirad, A., & Amirteimoori, A. (2025). A novel adjustable intuitionistic fuzzy framework for two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application in the banking sector. Information Sciences, 718, 122372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2025.122372
[42]    Chen, L., & Wang, Y.-M. (2025). Efficiency decomposition and frontier projection of two-stage network DEA under variable returns to scale. European Journal of Operational Research, 322(1), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.10.038
[43]    Zou, Z., & Lio, W. (2025). Efficiency decomposition for the relational two-stage data envelopment analysis approach with uncertain data. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 208, 111335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2025.111335
[44] Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., & Färe, R. (1996). Benefit and distance functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 70(2), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1996.0096
[45]    Chen, Y., Li, Y., Liang, L., Salo, A., & Wu, H. (2016). Frontier projection and efficiency decomposition in two-stage processes with slacks-based measures. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(2), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.052
[46]    Azizi, H. (2012). A new approach for supplier selection in the presence of imprecise data: DEA with double frontiers. Management Research in Iran, 16(2), 129–150. (In Persian) https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.2322200.1391.16.2.8.7
[47]    Azizi, H., Amirteimoori, A., & Kordrostami, S. (2016). A data envelopment analysis approach with efficient and inefficient frontiers for supplier selection in the presence of both undesirable outputs and imprecise data. Modern Researches in Decision Making, 1(2), 139-170. (In Persian)
[48]    Azizi, H., Farzipoor Saen, R., & Azadi, M. (2025). Obviating some of the theoretical barriers of analytical hierarchy process by a revised eigenvector method: A case study in sustainable supplier selection. Annals of Operations Research, 355(2), 2423–2477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05688-6
[49]    Khodakarami, M., Shabani, A., Farzipoor Saen, R., & Azadi, M. (2015). Developing distinctive two-stage data envelopment analysis models: An application in evaluating the sustainability of supply chain management. Measurement, 70, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.03.024
[50]    Shaverdi, M., Heshmati, M. R., Eskandaripour, E., & Tabar, A. A. A. (2013). Developing sustainable SCM evaluation model using fuzzy AHP in publishing industry. Procedia Computer Science, 17, 340–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.044
[51]    Aparicio, J., Pastor, J. T., & Ray, S. C. (2013). An overall measure of technical inefficiency at the firm and at the industry level: The ‘lost profit on outlay’. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(1), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.032
[52]    Lin, R., & Liu, Q. (2021). Multiplier dynamic data envelopment analysis based on directional distance function: An application to mutual funds. European Journal of Operational Research, 293(3), 1043–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.01.005
[53]    Azizi, H., & Amirteimoori, A. (2017). Flexible Measures in Production Process: A New Approach Based On Double-Frontier DEA. Modern Researches in Decision Making, 2(2), 197–216. (In Persian)