نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد دانشگاه اصفهان، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
چکیده
امروزه با توجه به‌اینکه کارکنان از بلوغ فکری قابل توجهی برخوردار هستند به دنبال ایجاد تعامل و همدلی سازمانی بین خود و مافوقشان هستند. این امر موجب مشارکت هرچه بیشتر کارکنان در سازمان‌ها شده است. هدف از این مقاله، طراحی و تبیین مدل مدیریت مافوق در شرکت گاز استان اصفهان بود. روش این پژوهش از لحاظ هدف، توسعه‌ای- کاربردی و از لحاظ روش، از جمله پژوهش‌های ترکیبی (کیفی و کمی) است. میدان تحقیق در بخش کیفی شامل 29 نفر مدیران شرکت گاز بودند که 14 نفر از آنها با روش نمونه گیری هدفمند، مصاحبه‌های نیمه ساختار یافته و با رعایت قاعده اشباع انتخاب شدند. جامعه آماری در بخش کمی شامل 881 نفر مدیران و کارشناسان مناطق 6 گانه و ستاد مرکزی شرکت گاز بودند که با استفاده از فرمول5q<n<15q تعداد 400 عدد پرسشنامه توزیع گردید. برای بررسی برازش مدل مفهومی از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته استفاده گردید و جهت بررسی روایی بخش کیفی از شاخص و نسبت روایی محتوایی استفاده شد و همچنین از روش بازآزمون به منظور سنجش پایایی بخش کیفی استفاده شد و پایایی بخش کمی با ضرائب آلفای کرونباخ سنجیده شد. در بخش یافته‌ها در بخش کیفی، تحلیل مصاحبه‌ها منجر به استخراج 57 مفهوم شد که در قالب شش مقوله اصلی روش داده بنیاد طبقه بندی شدند. در بخش کمی، مدل طراحی شده با استفاده از نرم افزار‌های SPSS 20،Smart PLS 3.0 مورد آزمون قرار گرفت. در پایان، نتایج بخش کمی نشانگر اعتبار مدل طراحی شده در بخش کیفی و پذیرش همه فرضیه‌های پژوهش بود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Desining and explaining a model for managing up(case study: Isfahan Province Gas Company)
نویسندگان [English]
- mahmoudreza nematbakhsh 1
- ali nasr Isfahani 2
- ALI SAFARI 2
1 Doctoral student of Business Administration, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Isfahan University, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده [English]
Nowadays, since the employees have significant intellectual maturity, they seek to create interaction and organizational empathy between themselves and their superiors. This has resulted in more participation of employees in organizations. The purpose of this article was to design and explain managing up model in Gas Company of Isfahan province. The method of this research is developmental- applied in terms of purpose, and in terms of method, it is combination research (qualitative and quantitative). The field of research in the qualitative part included 29 managers of company that 14 of whom were selected by purposeful sampling, semi-structured interviews and by observing the saturation rule. The statistical population in the quantitative section included 881 managers and experts from 6 regions and the central headquarters of company, and 400 questionnaires were distributed by using the formula 5q<n<15q. To evaluate the suitability of the developed conceptual model, a researcher-made questionnaire was used, and to check the validity and reliability, the content validity index and ratio, and the retest method was used, and the reliability of the quantitative part was measured with Cronbach's alpha coefficients. In the findings section, the analysis of the interviews led to the extraction of 57 concepts, which were classified in the form of six main categories of the data basis theory. In the quantitative part, the designed model was tested by using SPSS, and Smart PLS. The results showed the validity of the model designed in the qualitative part and the acceptance of all research hypotheses.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Intellectual maturity
- organizational interaction
- organizational participation
- managing up
[2] Akhavan, P., and Pezeshkan, A. (2010). Providing a framework for developing human resources strategies with an emphasis on the knowledge dimension. MANAGEMENT RESEARCH IN IRAN (MODARES HUMAN SCIENCES), 15(1), 1-29. (In Persion)
[3] Hughes, R. G., Ginnett, R. R. and Curphy, G. (2012). Leadership: Enhancing The Lessons of Experience (7th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
[4] Bonica, M. J., & Hartman, C. (2018). Managing Up and Followership: Competencies for First-Year Health Administrators. Journal of Health Administration Education, 35(3), 327-352.
[5] Soleimani, F., Albadvi, A., Aghdasi, M., and Ostadi, B. (2018). Provide a mathematical formula to calculate employee value. New researches in decision making, 4(1), 101-118. (In Persion)
[6] Sepahvand, R., Amiri, Z., Farokhi, M., and Amiri, Y. (2017). The effect of religious capital on organizational citizenship behavior (case study: Social Security Organization of Isfahan). MANAGEMENT RESEARCH IN IRAN (MODARES HUMAN SCIENCES), 21(2), 47-68. (In Persion)
[7] Tabak, F., & Lebron, M. (2017). Learning by Doing in Leadership Education: Experiencing Followership and Effective Leadership Communication Through Role-Play. Journal of Leadership Education, 16(2).
[8] Nelson, C. K. (2021). Managing Up, Down, and Across the Organization: An Exploration of Leadership Perspectives in Executive Management of Public Organizations (Doctoral dissertation, University of La Verne).
[9] Walia, A. (2017). Followership style in middle management. India: EXCEL INDIA PUBLISHERS.
[10] Kumar, S., Adhish, V. S., & Chauhan, A. (2015). Managing bosses and peers. Indian Journal of Community Medicine: official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine, 40(1), 14-18.
[11] Owen, J. (2007). Manage your boss. Industrial and Commercial Training, 39(2), 79-84.
[12] Blanchard, A. L., Welbourne, J., Gilmore, D., & Bullock, A. (2009). Followership styles and employee attachment to the organization. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 12(2), 111-131.
[13] Lewis, D. (2008). Managing upward :maximizing effectiveness with your boss. Biomedical Instrumentation &Technology, 42(6), 447-449.
[14] Gossett, S. (2021). Managing Up Is Hard. It’s Even Harder in Tech. Provided by: builtin.com. Retrieved, 2022.
[15] Stevenson, J. (2001). Persuasion as a strategy for managing up. American journal of health-system pharmacy, 58(suppl_1), S4-S6.
[16] Bjugstad, K., Thach, E. C., Thompson, K. J., & Morris, A. (2006). A fresh look at followership: A model for matching followership and leadership styles. Journal of behavioral and applied management, 7(3), 304-319.
[17] Buchanan, N. T., & Settles, I. H. (2019). Managing (in) visibility and hypervisibility in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 113, 1-5.
[18] Jalaja, V., Padashetty, S. (2018). Employee Experience in Building Employee Engagement: An Employee Perspective. Economics & Social Sciences, 8(3), 17-28.
[19] Smith, S. L. (2010). “Managing up” Can improve teamwork in the OR. AORN Journal, 91(5), 576-582.
[20] Resnick, H. (2010, april). Managing up and managing down. Retrieved http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/learning/management_thinking/articles/pdf/resnick_managing.pdf
[21] Turk, W. (2007). The art of managing up. Defense AT&L, 26(2007), 21-23.
[22] Gerpott, F. H., Fasbender, U., & Burmeister, A. (2020). Respectful leadership and followers’ knowledge sharing: A social mindfulness lens. Human Relations, 73(6), 789-810.
[23] Daft, R. L. (2014). The Leadership ExperienDe. New York: Dengage Learning.
[24] Gibson, C., Hardy III, J. H., & Buckley, M. R. (2014). Understanding the role of networking in organizations. Career Development International, 19(2), 146-161.
)